Actually there are many reasons that could have produced this
regression even if the code of the runner has not changed at all: (1)
those tests weren't enabled before and now are and they weren't
passing or (2) the tests were changed or (3) my principal guess: the
translation strategy of a runners-core library changed and as a side
effect the tests fail in the runner, maybe the SDF/use_deprecated_read
changes.


On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:44 PM Brian Hulette <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You can look through the history of the PostCommit [1]. We only keep a couple 
> weeks of history, but it looks like we have one successful run from Sept 10, 
> 2020, marked as "keep forever", that ran on commit 
> 57055262e7a6bff447eef2df1e6efcda754939ca. Is that what you're looking for?
>
> (Somewhat related, I was under the impression that Jenkins always kept the 
> before/after runs around the last state change, but that doesn't seem to be 
> the case as the first failure we have is [3])
>
> Brian
>
> [1] 
> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/
> [2] 
> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/2049/
> [3] 
> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/2098/
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:36 PM Fernando Morales Martinez 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi team,
>> it is mentioned in this WI that the tests (GroupByKeyTest testLargeKeys100MB 
>> and testGroupByKeyWithBadEqualsHashCode) stopped working around five months 
>> ago.
>> I took a look at the PRs prior to that date and couldn't find a report 
>> stating that they were working.
>>
>> Is there a way to get reports from before June 2020 (the farthest back I was 
>> able to navigate) so I can compare the tests succeeding against them failing?
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> - Fernando Morales
>>
>> This email and its contents (including any attachments) are being sent to
>> you on the condition of confidentiality and may be protected by legal
>> privilege. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended recipient
>> is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
>> notify the sender by replying to this message and delete the material
>> immediately from your system. Any further use, dissemination, distribution
>> or reproduction of this email is strictly prohibited. Further, no
>> representation is made with respect to any content contained in this email.

Reply via email to