Thanks Brian, Ismael!

Benjamín (@benWize) opened PR https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14275
PostCommit checks are working
https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming_PR/64/


Just a heads up in case someone else from the dev team would like to take a
peak.

- Fernando Morales

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:37 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually there are many reasons that could have produced this
> regression even if the code of the runner has not changed at all: (1)
> those tests weren't enabled before and now are and they weren't
> passing or (2) the tests were changed or (3) my principal guess: the
> translation strategy of a runners-core library changed and as a side
> effect the tests fail in the runner, maybe the SDF/use_deprecated_read
> changes.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:44 PM Brian Hulette <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > You can look through the history of the PostCommit [1]. We only keep a
> couple weeks of history, but it looks like we have one successful run from
> Sept 10, 2020, marked as "keep forever", that ran on commit
> 57055262e7a6bff447eef2df1e6efcda754939ca. Is that what you're looking for?
> >
> > (Somewhat related, I was under the impression that Jenkins always kept
> the before/after runs around the last state change, but that doesn't seem
> to be the case as the first failure we have is [3])
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > [1]
> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/
> > [2]
> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/2049/
> > [3]
> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_SparkStructuredStreaming/2098/
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:36 PM Fernando Morales Martinez <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi team,
> >> it is mentioned in this WI that the tests (GroupByKeyTest
> testLargeKeys100MB and testGroupByKeyWithBadEqualsHashCode) stopped working
> around five months ago.
> >> I took a look at the PRs prior to that date and couldn't find a report
> stating that they were working.
> >>
> >> Is there a way to get reports from before June 2020 (the farthest back
> I was able to navigate) so I can compare the tests succeeding against them
> failing?
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot!
> >> - Fernando Morales
> >>
> >> This email and its contents (including any attachments) are being sent
> to
> >> you on the condition of confidentiality and may be protected by legal
> >> privilege. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended
> recipient
> >> is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> immediately
> >> notify the sender by replying to this message and delete the material
> >> immediately from your system. Any further use, dissemination,
> distribution
> >> or reproduction of this email is strictly prohibited. Further, no
> >> representation is made with respect to any content contained in this
> email.
>

-- 
*This email and its contents (including any attachments) are being sent to
you on the condition of confidentiality and may be protected by legal
privilege. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended recipient
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
notify the sender by replying to this message and delete the material
immediately from your system. Any further use, dissemination, distribution
or reproduction of this email is strictly prohibited. Further, no
representation is made with respect to any content contained in this email.*

Reply via email to