On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:24 AM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
wrote:

> Confirming that the cut date is 4/28/2021 (in two days), right?
>

Yes, 2.30.0 branch is scheduled to be cut on April 28.


>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:41 PM Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the preparation!
> >
> > > a few responses that some high priority changes
> >
> > Would you be willing to share the items for visibility?
>
> There are several PRs in flight (or recently merged) to get
> portability working well with Dataflow for this release.
>

We can still cherry-pick them by importance after the branch cut.


>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:21 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Also the 2.29.0 was re-cut.
> > >
> > > Usually a delay in one release should not delay the next release,
> because each release represents a certain quantity of changes. But in this
> case, the actual quantity of changes is affected by the re-cut, too.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Heejong Lee <heej...@google.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Update on the 2.30.0 branch cut schedule:
> > >>
> > >> I'm thinking of delaying the branch cut a week since I've got a few
> responses that some high priority changes are still ongoing.
> > >>
> > >> The new cut date is April 28.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 6:07 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 and thank you!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:55 PM Heejong Lee <heej...@google.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Beam 2.30.0 release is scheduled to be cut on April 21 according to
> the release calendar [1]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd like to volunteer myself to be the release manager for this
> release. I plan on cutting the release branch on the scheduled date.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Any comments or objections ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Heejong
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1]
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouani...@group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Tomo
>

Reply via email to