+1 It seems we are pretty close on the upgrade. The same tricky problem as before, but it seems to be narrowed down.
Kenn On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > +1 fully agree. > > Regards > JB > > Le 10 mai 2021 à 16:02, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> a écrit : > > +1 for blocking the release - I think we should not release something > about which we _know_ that it might be legally problematic. And we should > definitely create a check in the build process that will warn about such > issues in the future. > > Jan > On 5/10/21 3:44 PM, Ismaël Mejía wrote: > > Tomo just confirmed in the ticket that if we update the gRPC vendored > version we won't need the JBoss dependency anymore so we should be good to > go with the upgrade. The open question is if this should be blocking for > the upcoming Beam 2.31.0 release or we can fix it afterwards. > > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:46 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We have been discussing about updating the vendored dependency in >> BEAM-11227 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11227>, if I >> remember correctly the newer version of gRPC does not require the jboss >> dependency, so probably is the best upgrade path, can you confirm Tomo >> Suzuki >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=suztomo> ? >> >> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >> >>> Also we have very similar discussion about it in >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-572 >>> Just to be clear about the context of it, it's not a legal requirement >>> of Apache Licence, it's Apache Software Foundation policy, that we should >>> not limit our users in using our software. If the LGPL dependency is >>> "optional", it's fine to add such optional dependency. If it is "required" >>> to run your software, then it is not allowed as it limits the users of ASF >>> software in further redistributing the software in the way they want (this >>> is at least my understanding of it). >>> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:58 PM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> You can take a look on >>>> >>>> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> Le 10 mai 2021 à 12:56, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elh...@ibiblio.org> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>> Anyone have a link to the official Apache policy about this? Thanks. >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> we are bundling dependencies with LGPL-2.1, according to license header >>>> >>>> in META-INF/maven/org.jboss.modules/jboss-modules/pom.xml. I think is >>>> >>>> might be an issue, already reported here: [1]. I created [2] to track it >>>> >>>> on our side. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22555 >>>> >>>> >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12316 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Elliotte Rusty Harold >>>> elh...@ibiblio.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> +48 660 796 129 <+48%20660%20796%20129> >>> >> >
