I have some configurations that did not work properly in 2.29.0 that I'd like to verify against this RC. Sorry I haven't got a chance to verify yet, but can you please wait for that? I am doing the verification right now.
Kenn On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:28 PM Heejong Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, we now have three binding votes and I will close the vote tomorrow > morning. > > The RC build is validated for most quickstart and mobile gaming examples > except Flink / Spark runner on YARN and standalone custers (more details in > the spreadsheet[9] from the original announcement). > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Verified the signatures are all good and the source tarball matches >> github. >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 3:38 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (binding) - I ran python quickstart examples on the direct runner. >> > >> > Thank you for preparing the RC! >> > >> > Ahmet >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:58 PM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> Tested some Java quickstart validations and multi-language pipelines. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Cham >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:03 PM Tomo Suzuki <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>> >> >>> Thank you for the preparation. With the GCP dependencies of my >> interest, the GitHub checks worked. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:55 AM Heejong Lee <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi everyone, >> >>>> >> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version >> 2.30.0, as follows: >> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) >> >>>> >> >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the >> release candidate, and vote +1 if no issues are found. >> >>>> >> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which >> includes: >> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1], >> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to >> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint >> DBC03F1CCF4240FBD0F256F054550BE0F4C0A24D [3], >> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], >> >>>> * source code tag "v2.30.0-RC1" [5], >> >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API >> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >> >>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.3 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_292. >> >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the >> dist.apache.org [2]. >> >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.30.0 release to help with >> validation [9]. >> >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10]. >> >>>> * Python artifacts are published to pypi as a pre-release version >> [11]. >> >>>> >> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Heejong >> >>>> >> >>>> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349978 >> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.30.0/ >> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >> >>>> [4] >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1174/ >> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.30.0-RC1 >> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14894 >> >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/613 >> >>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14895 >> >>>> [9] >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=109662250 >> >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image >> >>>> [11] https://pypi.org/project/apache-beam/2.30.0rc1/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Tomo >> >
