+1 (binding) Verified wordcount with various configuration parameters and they all worked. Particularly confirming that all the containers are chosen correctly.
Kenn On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Heejong Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:06 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have some configurations that did not work properly in 2.29.0 that I'd >> like to verify against this RC. Sorry I haven't got a chance to verify yet, >> but can you please wait for that? I am doing the verification right now. >> > > Sure. Please let me know when you finish the validation. > > >> >> Kenn >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:28 PM Heejong Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> FYI, we now have three binding votes and I will close the vote tomorrow >>> morning. >>> >>> The RC build is validated for most quickstart and mobile gaming examples >>> except Flink / Spark runner on YARN and standalone custers (more details in >>> the spreadsheet[9] from the original announcement). >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Verified the signatures are all good and the source tarball matches >>>> github. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 3:38 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > +1 (binding) - I ran python quickstart examples on the direct runner. >>>> > >>>> > Thank you for preparing the RC! >>>> > >>>> > Ahmet >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:58 PM Chamikara Jayalath < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 (binding) >>>> >> >>>> >> Tested some Java quickstart validations and multi-language pipelines. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >> Cham >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:03 PM Tomo Suzuki <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thank you for the preparation. With the GCP dependencies of my >>>> interest, the GitHub checks worked. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:55 AM Heejong Lee <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version >>>> 2.30.0, as follows: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >>>> comments) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the >>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if no issues are found. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which >>>> includes: >>>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1], >>>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to >>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint >>>> DBC03F1CCF4240FBD0F256F054550BE0F4C0A24D [3], >>>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], >>>> >>>> * source code tag "v2.30.0-RC1" [5], >>>> >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API >>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >>>> >>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.3 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_292. >>>> >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to >>>> the dist.apache.org [2]. >>>> >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.30.0 release to help with >>>> validation [9]. >>>> >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10]. >>>> >>>> * Python artifacts are published to pypi as a pre-release version >>>> [11]. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Heejong >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349978 >>>> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.30.0/ >>>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>>> >>>> [4] >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1174/ >>>> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.30.0-RC1 >>>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14894 >>>> >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/613 >>>> >>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14895 >>>> >>>> [9] >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=109662250 >>>> >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image >>>> >>>> [11] https://pypi.org/project/apache-beam/2.30.0rc1/ >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> Regards, >>>> >>> Tomo >>>> >>>
