This sounds reasonable to me as well. I've made swaps like this in the past, the base image of each is probably a bigger factor than the JDK. The openjdk images were based on Debian 11. The default eclipse-temurin images are based on Ubuntu 22.04 with an alpine option. Ubuntu is a Debian derivative but the versions and package names aren't exact matches and Ubuntu tends to update a little faster. For most users I don't think this will matter but users building custom containers may need to make minor changes. The alpine option will be much smaller (which could be a significant improvement) but would be a more significant change to the environment.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:18 PM Robert Bradshaw via dev <dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Seams reasonable to me. > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:19 PM Luke Cwik via user <u...@beam.apache.org> > wrote: > > > > As per [1], the JDK8 and JDK11 containers that Apache Beam uses have > stopped being built and supported since July 2022. I have filed [2] to > track the resolution of this issue. > > > > Based upon [1], almost everyone is swapping to the eclipse-temurin > container[3] as their base based upon the linked issues from the > deprecation notice[1]. The eclipse-temurin container is released under > these licenses: > > Apache License, Version 2.0 > > Eclipse Distribution License 1.0 (BSD) > > Eclipse Public License 2.0 > > 一 (Secondary) GNU General Public License, version 2 with OpenJDK > Assembly Exception > > 一 (Secondary) GNU General Public License, version 2 with the GNU > Classpath Exception > > > > I propose that we swap all our containers to the eclipse-temurin > containers[3]. > > > > Open to other ideas and also would be great to hear about your > experience in any other projects that you have had to make a similar > decision. > > > > 1: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/505 > > 2: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/25371 > > 3: https://hub.docker.com/_/eclipse-temurin >
