That would be awesome. Full disclosure - I </3 SVN but <3 git.

Happy to help however I can and any experience anyone has for making that
happen is welcomed. :)

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> The updated website looks good to me. I agree that it will simplify
> work for a lot of people who are used to Jekyll.
>
> The website is already in the SVN repository. After we have sorted out
> the CCLAs, the only thing that is left is a GitHub sync to make it
> more accessible for contributors. The prerequisite for that is that we
> change it to Git. Apache Infra can do that (we have done likewise for
> the Flink website repository and it works great).
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:04 AM, James Malone
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Since we're in the process of getting bootstrapped, I wanted to improve
> on
> > our website a bit, especially since we have a new logo.
> >
> > The first site was built using Maven sites. To be honest, it presented a
> > bit of a problem because many of the Beam committers have used GitHub
> docs
> > to date and wanted a system which was somewhat similar. Since GH docs is
> > built on Jekyll (as far as I know) I figured that might actually be an
> > easier way to build the website anyway.
> >
> > So, I just updated the incubator website. with an exact copy of the old
> > site but using Jekyll + Bootstrap 3. That should hopefully make it easier
> > for anyone and everyone to work against (and to move existing docs.)
> >
> > The repository for the current site is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/evilsoapbox/beam-site
> >
> > I also have a tgz of the old site in case there's any concern or
> > disagreement. Needless to say, when we sort out the CCLAs (which should
> be
> > very soon) I'd like to get this in a project repo somewhere so we can
> have
> > better version control and review.
> >
> > Finally, the theme is basic bootstrap with a few changes (like using
> Roboto
> > as the font to match the logo.) I figure if/when there's interest in
> > detailed design, we can cover that as a seperate discussion.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > James
>

Reply via email to