I currently only own "sdk-java-gcp", which does not give me great visibility into the bugs that are not Google Cloud-specific. I would like to see more of the IO-related issues earlier, so in that sense it makes sense to me to have a broader IO component.
I looked at "sdk-java-extensions" and everything in there right now is IO. Maybe we should rename -extensions to -io and then rename sdk-java-gcp to sdk-java-io-gcp? On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Frances Perry <[email protected]> wrote: > The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions > (e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if needed, > but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you > think, as component owner? > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi beamers ! >> >> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially, I'm >> moving the different IOs in their own folder. >> >> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create >> the IO component in Jira. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > >
