We'll like have some other extensions (statistical libraries, etc). But I agree that it's confusing people as it is. +1 to creating java-sdk-io and renaming java-sdk-gcp to java-sdk-io-gcp.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Good point Dan: if sdk-java-extension component actually contains only IO > related, why not rename it (it could be easier for users ;)). > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/21/2016 06:04 PM, Dan Halperin wrote: > >> I currently only own "sdk-java-gcp", which does not give me great >> visibility into the bugs that are not Google Cloud-specific. I would like >> to see more of the IO-related issues earlier, so in that sense it makes >> sense to me to have a broader IO component. >> >> I looked at "sdk-java-extensions" and everything in there right now is IO. >> Maybe we should rename -extensions to -io and then rename sdk-java-gcp to >> sdk-java-io-gcp? >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Frances Perry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions >>> (e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if >>> needed, >>> but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you >>> think, as component owner? >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi beamers ! >>>> >>>> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially, >>>> I'm >>>> moving the different IOs in their own folder. >>>> >>>> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create >>>> the IO component in Jira. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
