We support Flink 1.1.2 on the latest snapshot version
0.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. Would it be possible for you to work with
this version?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Chawla,Sumit <sumitkcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When trying to use Beam 0.2.0 with Flink 1.1.0 jar, i am seeing following
> error:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.StreamingRuntimeContext.registerTimer(JLorg/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/operators/Triggerable;)V
>         at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.flink.translation.wrappers.streaming.io.UnboundedSourceWrapper.setNextWatermarkTimer(UnboundedSourceWrapper.java:381)
>         at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.flink.translation.wrappers.streaming.io.UnboundedSourceWrapper.run(UnboundedSourceWrapper.java:233)
>         at 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.StreamSource.run(StreamSource.java:80)
>         at 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.StreamSource.run(StreamSource.java:53)
>         at 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.SourceStreamTask.run(SourceStreamTask.java:56)
>         at 
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:266)
>         at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:584)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
> Regards
> Sumit Chawla
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Chawla,Sumit <sumitkcha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> The release-0.2.0-incubating supports Flink 1.0.3. With Flink 1.1.0 out,
>> is there a plan to support it with any 0.2.0 patch? I tried compiling 0.2.0
>> with Flink 1.1.0,
>> and got couple of compliation errors in FlinkGroupAlsoByWindowWrapper.java.
>> Going back to master i see lots of change in Flink translation wrappers,
>> and
>> FlinkGroupAlsoByWindowWrapper.java being removed.
>>
>> Just want to get a sense of things here, on what would it take to support 
>> Flink
>> 1.1.0 with release-0.2.0. Would appreciate views of people who are already
>> working on upgrading it to Flink 1.1.0
>>
>> Regards
>> Sumit Chawla
>>
>>

Reply via email to