My point is that the bar should not be high for committer-ship but not too low as the key thing is valuable contribution.
Open mind/discussion, documentation, code, ... are valuable. On the other hand, IMHO, it's also human consideration and behavior. So it's discussion. Not sure I understand the purpose of your e-mails. Regards JB On Oct 24, 2016, 13:48, at 13:48, Christian Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: >I know how apache projects work. You should know me long enough to >know. >For people who are less familiar with the process.. One pmc member >proposes someone as new committer and the pmc members >vote on him/her. > >Every project of course has a different idea of how high that bar for >entry should be. So my question was just meant to give contributors an >idea of what to expect. Is that weird to ask? >So for example if you would propose someone, what would be the minimum >level of contribution before you have a good feeling to propose >him/her. > >Christian > >On 24.10.2016 12:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> >> Your e-mail sounds "weird" to me: like other Apache projects, if your >contribution is valuable and sustained, then you will deserve >committer-ship. It's meritocracy based. >> >> Working part time is not a problem, it would make little bit more >time to get into. So, just a timing point, nothing blocker. >> >> Regards >> JB >> > >-- >Christian Schneider >http://www.liquid-reality.de > >Open Source Architect >http://www.talend.com
