Now I understand the purpose of your e-mail. It wasn't obvious to me. And it's because I know you that I was surprised by the e-mail. I think your e-mail was aim to be informative, and I try to provide an informative answer.
Regarding Beam, it's large project with a production grade background and legacy. That's why some non committer guys have done a huge work. As they are still active in the community, they deserve committer-ship. On the other hand, we had a great discussion between the PPMC about this first committer round. It's hard to provide numbers to show a committer bar. There are implicit feeling as well. For instance, as a PPMC, I would vote 0 or -1 if my feeling is that the guy is not aligned with the Beam community. My short answer is that we try to keep the bar not too high as soon as we have valuable contribution to the community. Regards JB On Oct 24, 2016, 16:10, at 16:10, Christian Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: >I was just a bit concerned that new committers might have to do >comparable contributions like the current three new committers .. which > >might be quite a high bar :-) > >Christian > >On 24.10.2016 16:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> My point is that the bar should not be high for committer-ship but >not too low as the key thing is valuable contribution. >> >> Open mind/discussion, documentation, code, ... are valuable. On the >other hand, IMHO, it's also human consideration and behavior. So it's >discussion. >> >> Not sure I understand the purpose of your e-mails. >> >> Regards >> JB >> > >-- >Christian Schneider >http://www.liquid-reality.de > >Open Source Architect >http://www.talend.com
