No dissent from me (much assent in fact :) ). This sounds great. If there's anything I can do to help in the Mirror layer (where I'd be most useful here), let me know -- I'd be happy to pitch in.
Rich Eddie O'Neil wrote: >All-- > > Now that 1.0 is out the door, it seems like it's time to put some >effort into updating WSM and getting to passing the TCK. We discussed >this a while back in terms: > >- changing the annotation processor to use Mirror types and to allow >for a Mirror and reflection abstraction >- architectural fixup that would more easily facilitate additional >features like JAX-RPC code generation >- removing the .ser files so that we don't require serialized Java >objects at runtime and switching this onto an XML file to describe the >relevant web service metadata > >I've got a large amount of this work sitting in my sandbox and would >like to look at bringing it over to trunk/. Any dissent to this work >starting? > > Certainly would welcome any help with this... > >Eddie > > >
