+1 I took a look at the work that Eddie's done in his sandbox, and from an architectural perspective I concur with the approach it takes vs. the current structure.
On 10/5/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No dissent from me (much assent in fact :) ). This sounds great. If > there's anything I can do to help in the Mirror layer (where I'd be most > useful here), let me know -- I'd be happy to pitch in. > > Rich > > Eddie O'Neil wrote: > > >All-- > > > > Now that 1.0 is out the door, it seems like it's time to put some > >effort into updating WSM and getting to passing the TCK. We discussed > >this a while back in terms: > > > >- changing the annotation processor to use Mirror types and to allow > >for a Mirror and reflection abstraction > >- architectural fixup that would more easily facilitate additional > >features like JAX-RPC code generation > >- removing the .ser files so that we don't require serialized Java > >objects at runtime and switching this onto an XML file to describe the > >relevant web service metadata > > > >I've got a large amount of this work sitting in my sandbox and would > >like to look at bringing it over to trunk/. Any dissent to this work > >starting? > > > > Certainly would welcome any help with this... > > > >Eddie > > > > > > >
