I can go ahead and do this work, adding a new forTagId attribute to
the <netui:rewriteName> tag so that it rewrites a name using the
scoping in the page rather than the request. Within the implementation
we can call a base class routine, getIdForTagId() to get the real tag
id to generate rather than going through the URLRewriter. I'll open a
JIRA issue for tracking this enhancement. Thanks again for the help.
Carlin
On 12/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No problem. :) Hope it helped.
FWIW, it seems like this would be a useful feature -- there are lots
of HTML tags that don't otherwise have a way to participate in the
NetUI JavaScript scoping features.
Eddie
On 12/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I agree with you about the use of EL. Thanks for the info.
>
> On 12/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Carlin--
> >
> > Yes -- that's one way to use them. Another might look like:
> >
> > <netui:rewriteName name="foo" resultId="fooString" forTagId="true"/>
> > <div id="${pageScope.fooString}">
> >
> > </div>
> >
> > The "resultId" pattern by JSP tags to add values to the PageContext
> > attribute map. Then, those values can be referenced using JSP EL as
> > ${pageScope.fooStr} or scriptlet.
> >
> > The <rewriteName> tag is used in both of these ways today, though I
> > personally prefer EL to the in-line example. :)
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, thanks. I've looked at SRS some.
> > >
> > > So just to make sure I follow, the page developer would then be using
> > > a tag to set an attribute of another tag. Something like...
> > >
> > > <div id="<netui:rewriteName name='myFragDiv' forTagId='true'/>">
> > > ...
> > > </div>
> > >
> > > ...or some other general tag other than rewriteName. Is that what you
> > > were thinking? I guess my first thought was that it seemed a little
> > > weird to use a tag to set an attribute of another tag but not a big
> > > deal. What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > > Carlin
> > >
> > > On 12/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Maybe the ScriptRequestState object and use the "mapTagId" method
> > > > would help here -- SRS is a nice data structure for tracking the
> > > > mapping that's used to render the JavaScript that's ultimately written
> > > > to the page.
> > > >
> > > > HTH.
> > > >
> > > > Eddie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > OK, I'll take a look and see, though I'm not yet sure how to tie it
> > > > > into generating the entries for the netui_tagIdNameMap for the script
> > > > > container. My thought was that a tag that was mapped to an HTML
> > > > > element like <div> could just leverage the existing tagId attribute
> > > > > and script container support. It would basically extend the
> > > > > HtmlBaseTag.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > > > > Carlin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > That makes sense -- it seems like the same functionality be
> > > > > > generally implemented by doing something similar to <rewriteName>
> > > > > > which creates a scoped name, makes it available in the pageContext,
> > > > > > and registers it with list of HTML ids to render. How about a new
> > > > > > rewriteName attribute or a new tag that does the same for page
scoped
> > > > > > names?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That would be a solution that could be used on all HTML tags.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, correct. And in addition, if this was within a
> > > > > > > <netui:scriptContainer generateIdScope="true">
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > </netui:scriptContainer>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the id would be scoped, so rendered like...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <div id="n0.foo">...</div>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carlin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Carlin--
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Right -- you're talking about scoping in the page rather than
> > > > > > > > scoping a request, though I'm still not sure I'm clear on the
use of
> > > > > > > > the tag.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is the goal to have a NetUI tag that renders a <div> which is
> > > > > > > > registered with the rendered tagId / id mapping JavaScript?
Something
> > > > > > > > like:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <netui:div tagId="foo">
> > > > > > > > ....
> > > > > > > > </netui:div>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > that renders:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <div id="foo">...</div>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > along with the JavaScript to map the rendered <div> into the
> > > > > > > > netui_names / netui_tagIdNameMap.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 12/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The <netui:rewriteName> tag is designed to participate in URL
> > > > > > > > > rewriting. Say in a portal, the URL rewriting is for the
scoping a
> > > > > > > > > request to a portlet and just prepends the portlet scope to a
name.
> > > > > > > > > This request scoping is different than the scoping generated
with the
> > > > > > > > > NetUI tag and JavaScript support within <netui:scriptContainer
> > > > > > > > > generateIdScope="true">. The tags generate a map in a page
for the
> > > > > > > > > tagId attributes of NetUI tags and can scope them to the
> > > > > > > > > scriptContainer tag... but it's a different scoping.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The <netui:divPanel> tag is used as a dynamic client side
routine for
> > > > > > > > > switching between different template sections within the
panel. At
> > > > > > > > > first I thought this could be used but the generated id on the
> > > > > > > > > rendered div tags doesn't seem to work for this case. I just
tried a
> > > > > > > > > simple test. There may be a way to get this to go but still
does not
> > > > > > > > > feel very intuitive as it involves using
<netui-template:section>,
> > > > > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Carlin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 12/13/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Carlin--
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Interesting idea, though I thought this could be
accomplished with a
> > > > > > > > > > regular HTML <div>, the generated NetUI JavaScript, and the
> > > > > > > > > > <netui:rewriteName> tag. For example, the type of thing
that's
> > > > > > > > > > available here in "web/tags/rewriteTags/index.jsp".
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Would the <netui:div> panel do something different?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 12/13/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > At the moment there isn't an easy way to map a fragment
of markup with
> > > > > > > > > > > a NetUI tag using a tagId to use with the NetUI client
side JavaScript
> > > > > > > > > > > support. Most of the NetUI tags have the tagId attribute
for the
> > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript support but the tags map to specific form
controls and
> > > > > > > > > > > acnhors, etc.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose adding a <netui:div> tag to the set
of NetUI HTML tags.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > One use case is a page using the NetUI tag scoping of the
generated
> > > > > > > > > > > HTML id attributes and custom client side JavaScript code
that needs
> > > > > > > > > > > to access a fragment of markup using the NetUI
lookIdByTagId()
> > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript function. The markup in the fragment may not
require or use
> > > > > > > > > > > other NetUI tags. Something like...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > <netui:div tagId="myFragDiv">
> > > > > > > > > > > <someprefix:someTag ..."/>
> > > > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > > > </div>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Any concerns or thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Carlin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
