Can we arrange it so that we have a default type of search, but that we can make some type of configurable search interface so that particular sources can have different types of controlled or uncontrolled searches?�
I'm personally of the opinion that we need to learn not from library databases here, but from Google.
I'm strongly of the opposite opinion.
Google's simple query works well for two main reasons:
Web pages do not have structure (or are not indexed with what very very little structure they do have) so there's no need for multiple fields.
Web searches are looking for data that you do not know. One presumes that the opposite is true when you are searching within your own database of citations.
-- Rob
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ ,'--/::(@)::. Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805 ,'---/::::::::::. University of Liverpool ____/:::::::::::::. L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/ I L L U M I N A T I
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
