On Monday 13 February 2006 11:43 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Hi All, > > Am not sure this is a good idea, but I'm contemplating some changes to > the way I handle metadata in CSL. One of them is an "area" attribute > to make it easier to find styles. In that case, I may as well consider > constraining the values. > > Do you think we could come up with a commonly agreed list of areas? > E.g.: > > humanities > social sciences > biological sciences > engineering > physical sciences > law > > ... ? > > This is notwithstanding that some fields (like mine) may straddle areas. It seems a reasonable idea. However some styles may be used in several academic fields. Also there might be some very inconsistent use out there. > > This sort of categorization may be useful too for the journal > abbreviation issue we were earlier discussing. > It would certainly work for journal styles. > Bruce > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
