I read through the exchange and I think you put your position very well and the response was rather defensively or evasive.
David On Saturday 15 July 2006 10:52 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for > the new bib support in Word 2007*: > > 1) they won't support footnote/endnote citations in v1 > 2) seems (?) they don't support first/subsequent distinctions in > author-year 3) they think it perfectly fine to have styles implemented in > raw XSLT (they don't appear interested in using CSL or a CSL-like > abstraction) > > So this tells us where we can differentiate OOo. There's going to be a > lot of frustration with their default support, particularly among the > historians. > > Also, on 3, it should possible to swap in a citeproc-like solution, > and so get support for CSL in Word through the back door. Hmm ... > wonder if I should try to productize citeproc for the Word market? > ;-) > > Bruce > > * see comments at > <http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/07/13/664960.aspx> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ------------------- David N. Wilson Co-Project Lead for the Bibliographic OpenOffice Project http://bibliographic.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
