[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13689906#comment-13689906
]
Venkat Ranganathan commented on BIGTOP-1016:
--------------------------------------------
I agree on the conflicts created for some of the currently used commands.
Thinking more about this issue, it is no different between HBase using 0.95
previews leading to 0.96. So, may be using Sqoop 1.4.x until Sqoop 2 first
release is out may be another approach.
Thanks
Venkat
> Add a new package to bring back Sqoop 1.4.x
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BIGTOP-1016
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1016
> Project: Bigtop
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>
> On dev@bigtop, Venkat Ranganathan wrote in to say:
> {quote}
> While I understand the motivation behind moving on with Sqoop2 based
> releases (I was part of the 1.99.2 release) Sqoop 1.99.x is an evolving
> preview release and I think it would make it easier for Sqoop users if
> we have both Sqoop2 and Sqoop 1.x available until there is some more
> feature parity. It may be a specific situation with Sqoop project alone
> with two releases actively being developed.
> I would propose this if there is an update.
> {quote}
> If this is generally agreeable, it seems straightforward to port the Sqoop
> 1.4.x based package from Bigtop 0.5 to trunk, perhaps as a new "sqoop1"
> package.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
