Indeed, seems like we are out of opinions ;)
Jay, do you mind re-starting the [VOTE]?

Thanks,
  Cos

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 01:53PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I want to wrap up this thread as it slowed down quit a bit.
> 
> Have everyone expressed their views, so we can restart the [VOTE] if needed?
>   Cos
> 
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 08:53PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Honestly, I think the proposed plan is an overkill. This is a no-brainer
> > transition from one build system into another. It's not like we are going to
> > throw away make system in the next 11 hours or so. It can stand around as 
> > long
> > as people here are comfortable with. We can keep it around for 0.9.0 
> > timeframe
> > and just let people adjust (and perhaps fix some bugs if found). The first
> > step after 0.8.0 would be to switch our CI system to it, where we'd be able 
> > to
> > take advantage of concurrent abilities of the new system and all that.
> > 
> > Just for the record: new build follows precisely the same interface as the 
> > old
> > one. Everything you need to do is run 'gradle' and see what tasks are there.
> > So, literally, there's nothing new to learn about how the build works.
> > You do 'gradle rpm' and got yourself a full stack built as RPM, etc.
> > 
> > "Leaving anyone behind" is an over-dramatization, IMO :) But... if people
> > want to have a session around gradle - why not?! 
> > Oh yeah - +1 on what Andrew said: other dysfunctional communities shouldn't
> > set a precedent here :)
> > 
> > Hope it makes sense
> >   Cos
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:06AM, jay vyas wrote:
> > > I agree wiith mark that we need to make it easy and individuals in the
> > > community need to be comfortable with the transition. I propose a solution
> > > at the end o this email.
> > > 
> > > Heres where we are at:
> > > 
> > > - Realistically, the debate on which is "better" is not going to be very
> > > fruitful.... We all know the high-level pros and cons of both Makefile and
> > > build.gradle .
> > > 
> > > - Neither is perfect,but > 50% of community parties agree gradle is a step
> > > forward.
> > > 
> > > jay +.1 (im netural with a slight lean to gradle)
> > > cos, roman, sean, +3 (all are ready to move forward)
> > > mark effectively might say is a -1
> > > 
> > > ************* - But we don't want to leave anyone behind!
> > > **********************
> > > 
> > > But we also need to move fast !  We dont want a schizophrenic or forked
> > > community.
> > > 
> > > SO HERE IS MY SUGGESTION:
> > > 
> > > 1) we schedule a meetup, or a screencast - specifically to go through the
> > > gradle code - from A to Z -
> > > 2) We validate and build all of bigtop, using gradle, during the
> > > screencast.  NO EXCEPTIONS.   That way we are all 100% sure that it works,
> > > and we see it in action.
> > > 3) After that screen cast, we ensure that we have a unified community 
> > > which
> > > can self-sufficiently administer the gradle based build - as soon as
> > > possible.
> > > 4) If all parties to (1) agree that they are now ready , we delete the
> > > Makefile forever, in a patch which updates the README file with excellent
> > > explanation of how the build.gradle works.
> > > 
> > > This is the most rapid way to move the entire community forward in unison
> > > and prevent code rot of maintaining duplicate features .
> > > 
> > > Mark, and others, how do you feel about this idea?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Mark Grover <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Thanks for starting this thread, Jay and Cos.
> > > >
> > > > Here are my thoughts:
> > > > Gradle may actually be a better choice for Bigtop. However, in my 
> > > > opinion,
> > > > Make should be kept around for a little while to make the transition 
> > > > easy
> > > > for the community.
> > > >
> > > > I would go as far as saying that we shouldn't be deprecating Make right
> > > > now. In my opinion, it's best to have a transition period where we all
> > > > support both Gradle and Make. During this time, contributors and 
> > > > committers
> > > > work (albeit, with a little extra pain)  with both and develop their own
> > > > opinion on which tool is the best for the project. Some of us may 
> > > > already
> > > > have developed such experience by using various tools in the past while
> > > > others may have not. The idea is to give all members of the community an
> > > > opportunity to make such a decision for themselves and share them with 
> > > > the
> > > > community.
> > > > And, consequently, the official decision to deprecate a tool from the
> > > > project shouldn't happen before this transition period, but after.
> > > >
> > > > Hope that makes sense.
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sean Mackrory <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not super familiar with Gradle yet, but here are my thoughts:
> > > > >
> > > > > - It can't be any worse than make. I mean, $$($(1)-deb). I'd much 
> > > > > prefer
> > > > > debugging a more modern language, and as Cos points out, it's intended
> > > > for
> > > > > a JVM ecosystem but can do other things when needed.
> > > > > - I'd prefer we leave Make around for perhaps one more release just to
> > > > > really solidify the Gradle system a bit more. However if we keep it
> > > > > deprecated, I see no point in "maintaining" both, meaning that if 
> > > > > people
> > > > > want to add new features to the build (several JIRAs going on for that
> > > > > right now) - there's no need to keep adding that to the Makefile, 
> > > > > let's
> > > > > just keep the versions and metadata for new projects up to date. I 
> > > > > don't
> > > > > believe we routinely run into bugs, so I doubt much work will have to 
> > > > > be
> > > > > put in outside of bigtop.mk.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik 
> > > > > <[email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik 
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I am temporarily putting the [VOTE] thread to halt and instead
> > > > starting
> > > > > > > [DISCUSS]. Per Jay's:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BIGTOP-1314 highlights the fact that we now have 2 build systems:
> > > > > > Makefile
> > > > > > > and build.gradle. And the fact that the Makefile approach is now
> > > > > > > deprecated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As per Mark's suggestion in that JIRA, the future of Makefile 
> > > > > > > should
> > > > be
> > > > > > > decided on the mailing list before the next JIRA comes out to 
> > > > > > > further
> > > > > > > distance from Make and embrace gradle.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Should we continue to support the Makefile builder?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd be more than happy to get rid of it right after we release 
> > > > > > Bigtop
> > > > > 0.8.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > jay vyas
> 
> 

Reply via email to