I'd be cool with dropping it after Bigtop 0.8.0. Thanks, Roman.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Jay Vyas <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree w mark if there is at least one reason why you would want to package it > ? ... Does anyone in bigtop community have any interest/ want to / still use > whirr ? > > It could still take up time of maintainers... In terms of testing , updating > patch, confirming it for deb/centos/... > > >> On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Mark Grover <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That's likely going to be the outcome. >> >> However, I checked the build and it's failing on only one OS (SLES11) with >> an error we have become familiar with. BIGTOP-1400 fixed that same error >> earlier with Whirr. >> >> Given that the fix might be something simple as bumping up the permGen to >> 512m, why don't we give that a shot first? >> >> If it's any more involved than that, I'd be personally be ok with dropping >> it. >> >> Mark >> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Pretty sure whirr is headed for the attic. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Vyas <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> -For packaging of whirr... I don't see activity on it lately. Are bigtop >>>> folks using whirr? >>>> >>>> -for functionality of whirr, The bigtop-deploy/ recipes duplicate some >>> of >>>> whirrs functionality (we can add a vagrant-Ec2 recipe easily, I can help >>> ) >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 11:23 PM, plinnell <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Cos mentioned in one of the jiras that whirr is failing to build and >>>>> perhaps we should drop it. When whirr came out it was useful to >>>>> orchestrate Hadoop into a cloud. >>>>> >>>>> Nowadays, there are a multitude of frameworks for deploying into >>>>> clouds. Moreover, they are much more mature recently. >>>>> >>>>> Drop whirr ? >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Peter >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White) >>>
