Also +1, even as Whirr PMC chair. =) It was a valuable project that helped inspire a lot more advanced and specialized work since it came along, but it's basically a dead letter at this point and will be moving to the Attic soon.
A. On Saturday, September 6, 2014, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I'd be cool with dropping it after Bigtop 0.8.0. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Jay Vyas <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> Agree w mark if there is at least one reason why you would want to > package it ? ... Does anyone in bigtop community have any interest/ want > to / still use whirr ? > >> > >> It could still take up time of maintainers... In terms of testing , > updating patch, confirming it for deb/centos/... > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Mark Grover <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> > >>> That's likely going to be the outcome. > >>> > >>> However, I checked the build and it's failing on only one OS (SLES11) > with > >>> an error we have become familiar with. BIGTOP-1400 fixed that same > error > >>> earlier with Whirr. > >>> > >>> Given that the fix might be something simple as bumping up the permGen > to > >>> 512m, why don't we give that a shot first? > >>> > >>> If it's any more involved than that, I'd be personally be ok with > dropping > >>> it. > >>> > >>> Mark > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Pretty sure whirr is headed for the attic. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Vyas < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> -For packaging of whirr... I don't see activity on it lately. Are > bigtop > >>>>> folks using whirr? > >>>>> > >>>>> -for functionality of whirr, The bigtop-deploy/ recipes duplicate > some > >>>> of > >>>>> whirrs functionality (we can add a vagrant-Ec2 recipe easily, I can > help > >>>> ) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 11:23 PM, plinnell <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cos mentioned in one of the jiras that whirr is failing to build and > >>>>>> perhaps we should drop it. When whirr came out it was useful to > >>>>>> orchestrate Hadoop into a cloud. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nowadays, there are a multitude of frameworks for deploying into > >>>>>> clouds. Moreover, they are much more mature recently. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Drop whirr ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thoughts ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Peter > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> > >>>> - Andy > >>>> > >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>>> (via Tom White) > >>>> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein (via Tom White) >
