Ha ha, yes :) On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have a few fans of github on the list, so perhaps it'd be fair to ask > them > to implement the said improvement? ;) > > Cos > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:28AM, RJ Nowling wrote: > > I like the idea of a separate issues@ list. The GitHub integration is > very > > verbose and the spam on the JIRA is hard to parse. > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 08:24PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Catching up on emails post conference day, seeing bunch of what > seems to > > > be > > > > duped messages to mailing list per gitub transaction.., one to dev@, > > > and one > > > > to the jira, which then mails dev@. If that's case can probably > turn > > > off > > > > the github mailing and let jira do its thing? > > > > > > That'd be great! > > > > > > Another improvement we can do, is to configure JIRA to send only > "create" > > > notifications to dev@ and all the rest of them to some separate > issues@ > > > list. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > Cos > > > > > > >
