Ok, master is unlocked for 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT development I have also pushed branch-1.0 that has all the bits for 1.0 RC, but I don't have time to finish RC publishing up right now - will try to do it from the train, but who knows if I will have any connection there.
If anyone can pick up where I left-off - it'd be great: I am really trying to get on my damn vacation ;) If not - I will try to find a bit of time next week for this. Thanks all for your help, Cos On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:56AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Indeed. > > The one hurdle I am facing though is that with BIGTOP-1833 getting pushed to > the master (which I normally would appreciate ;) I have to fiddle with my > local branches as they already had a commit for this fix. Now, rebasing it > locally presents an issue where I need to fix some unpleasant conflicts in... > > Oh well, it will be done in a bit. > Cos > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:37PM, Evans Ye wrote: > > I've committed the BIGTOP-1833 patch. > > It's so exciting that we're at the moment ready to release bigtop 1.0. > > Please ping me if any help needed for release. > > > > Evans > > > > > > 2015-05-29 17:52 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > I have made all preparations for 1.0 RC and changed everything we need to > > > move > > > to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in the master. > > > > > > However, because BIGTOP-1833 hasn't been reviewed yet, I evidently haven't > > > pushed this change and other commits to the master nor branch-1.0. I would > > > unblock me immediately if someone can review BIGTOP-1833 changes. Then > > > patch > > > is rather trivial and I have tested it to make sure that the packages are > > > produced. > > > > > > I'd love to switch off to the vacation mode by the end of the day today > > > but > > > have to wrap up the RC process (at least the branch preparation part) > > > before > > > that. So if someone in Europe (during the day here) or later in NA can do > > > this > > > at your early convenience - it'd be just great! > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > Cos > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:03PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:11PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > > > Also, working on BIGTOP-1851 right now. Please pardon the delay, I was > > > sick > > > > > over the weekend. > > > > > > > > Thanks Andrew - hopefully are doing better now! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Cool, I went over to BIGTOP-1615 and it's already resolved. > > > > > > > > > > > > As for BIGTOP-1827, if it's just a package naming problem we can > > > > > > just > > > > > > rename it, right? See my comment on the issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Guys > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I think we are in the good shape to cut-off 1.0 branch tonight. I > > > have ran > > > > > >> full stack build on Ubuntu and everything is building fine now. Of > > > course > > > > > >> some > > > > > >> testing needs to be done ;) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> One last unresolved blocker is BIGTOP-1827. If I don't hear from > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> Tachyon component's maintainers I will have to remove this from the > > > > > >> release > > > > > >> 1.0 because the packages are broken and we can release them like > > > this. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> BIGTOP-1615 (another blocker) is in PA state, so if anyone can take > > > a > > > > > >> look - > > > > > >> it'd be great! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > >> Cos > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > > Hein > > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > > Hein > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
