hi cos, thanks for asking.
two of the new commits were critical since last minute changes broke compilation. I see no further technical Jiras waiting for inclusion into a 1.0 tag. But I am missing one „huge“ commit: Our web site is essentially a heap of obsolete stuff. Since the website is somehow generated from git, we should consolidate our site as well reflecting the 1.0 release (for instance removing 0.8 information from the frontpage). @all: Is there already any progress in this direction? Thanks, olaf > Am 01.07.2015 um 02:16 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > > Guys, > > I have noticed that branch-1.0 is now having these three committs: > > 11dc343 BIGTOP-1893: Compilation of hadoop-yarn-client failed > edc881d BIGTOP-1902: typo in > bigtop-deploy/vm/vagrant-puppet-vm/vagrantconfig.yaml > 885cd8f BIGTOP-1896. bigtop_toolchain broken bei ant update > > Now I would have to update CHANGES.txt and RELEASE notes for both master and > the branch. To me, those weren't that critical to include into the release, > but I guess it makes no harm. Any other changes we have to hold the release > for? > > Thanks, > Cos > >> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:14AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> Ok, master is unlocked for 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT development >> I have also pushed branch-1.0 that has all the bits for 1.0 RC, but I don't >> have time to finish RC publishing up right now - will try to do it from the >> train, but who knows if I will have any connection there. >> >> If anyone can pick up where I left-off - it'd be great: I am really trying to >> get on my damn vacation ;) If not - I will try to find a bit of time next >> week >> for this. >> >> Thanks all for your help, >> Cos >> >>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:56AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> Indeed. >>> >>> The one hurdle I am facing though is that with BIGTOP-1833 getting pushed to >>> the master (which I normally would appreciate ;) I have to fiddle with my >>> local branches as they already had a commit for this fix. Now, rebasing it >>> locally presents an issue where I need to fix some unpleasant conflicts >>> in... >>> >>> Oh well, it will be done in a bit. >>> Cos >>> >>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:37PM, Evans Ye wrote: >>>> I've committed the BIGTOP-1833 patch. >>>> It's so exciting that we're at the moment ready to release bigtop 1.0. >>>> Please ping me if any help needed for release. >>>> >>>> Evans >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-05-29 17:52 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Guys, >>>>> >>>>> I have made all preparations for 1.0 RC and changed everything we need to >>>>> move >>>>> to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in the master. >>>>> >>>>> However, because BIGTOP-1833 hasn't been reviewed yet, I evidently haven't >>>>> pushed this change and other commits to the master nor branch-1.0. I would >>>>> unblock me immediately if someone can review BIGTOP-1833 changes. Then >>>>> patch >>>>> is rather trivial and I have tested it to make sure that the packages are >>>>> produced. >>>>> >>>>> I'd love to switch off to the vacation mode by the end of the day today >>>>> but >>>>> have to wrap up the RC process (at least the branch preparation part) >>>>> before >>>>> that. So if someone in Europe (during the day here) or later in NA can do >>>>> this >>>>> at your early convenience - it'd be just great! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>> Cos >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:03PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:11PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >>>>>>> Also, working on BIGTOP-1851 right now. Please pardon the delay, I was >>>>> sick >>>>>>> over the weekend. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Andrew - hopefully are doing better now! >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool, I went over to BIGTOP-1615 and it's already resolved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for BIGTOP-1827, if it's just a package naming problem we can just >>>>>>>> rename it, right? See my comment on the issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Guys >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think we are in the good shape to cut-off 1.0 branch tonight. I >>>>> have ran >>>>>>>>> full stack build on Ubuntu and everything is building fine now. Of >>>>> course >>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>> testing needs to be done ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One last unresolved blocker is BIGTOP-1827. If I don't hear from the >>>>>>>>> Tachyon component's maintainers I will have to remove this from the >>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>> 1.0 because the packages are broken and we can release them like >>>>> this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BIGTOP-1615 (another blocker) is in PA state, so if anyone can take >>>>> a >>>>>>>>> look - >>>>>>>>> it'd be great! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> Cos >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >>>>> Hein >>>>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >>>>> Hein >>>>>>> (via Tom White) > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
