in particular, w/ ignite, i could see web apps w/ large object stores as storage, doing larger, faster queries for certain workloads, i.e. the using the jdbc stuff. same thing for in house apps that might need to operate on large posix stored data (like in gluster)
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:40 PM, RJ Nowling <[email protected]> wrote: > Ceph makes a better object store while Gluster makes a better file system. > That's why Ceph is a popular backend for OpenStack Swift. > > Does Ignite want a FS or Object backend? > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Good point... although I was curious about Ignite's take on that first > and > > foremost. Yet, cross-posting to [email protected] > > > > Jay et all: any thoughts about the combination? > > Cos > > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > I'm sure our RH brethren have something to say about Ceph. > > > Re-post on dev@bigtop? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Roman. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > I was looking at the Hadoop accelerator the other day and been > > thinking if > > > > anyone has tried to use IGFS on top of a real distributed file > > storage. The > > > > case in point is Ceph (ceph.com) - a Linux file system available > from > > any > > > > major Linux distribution as a kernel module. > > > > > > > > HDFS has its share in the world, but it isn't the fastest, simplest, > > nor most > > > > advantageous distributed storage on the planet. Hence I am wondering > > if this > > > > would be a good call to provide Ignite on CEPH as a 2nd FS > > capabilities. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Cos > > > > > > > -- jay vyas
