Hm... I would think that file system would be more beneficial, although object store on disk can also be valuable.
Cos, what is your thinking? D. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, RJ Nowling <[email protected]> wrote: > Ceph makes a better object store while Gluster makes a better file system. > That's why Ceph is a popular backend for OpenStack Swift. > > Does Ignite want a FS or Object backend? > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Good point... although I was curious about Ignite's take on that first > and > > foremost. Yet, cross-posting to [email protected] > > > > Jay et all: any thoughts about the combination? > > Cos > > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > I'm sure our RH brethren have something to say about Ceph. > > > Re-post on dev@bigtop? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Roman. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > I was looking at the Hadoop accelerator the other day and been > > thinking if > > > > anyone has tried to use IGFS on top of a real distributed file > > storage. The > > > > case in point is Ceph (ceph.com) - a Linux file system available > from > > any > > > > major Linux distribution as a kernel module. > > > > > > > > HDFS has its share in the world, but it isn't the fastest, simplest, > > nor most > > > > advantageous distributed storage on the planet. Hence I am wondering > > if this > > > > would be a good call to provide Ignite on CEPH as a 2nd FS > > capabilities. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Cos > > > > > > >
