Hi Jonathan, I actually want to remove R from the Spark 1.5.1 patch and add Spark R + the toll chain changes as a second patch / JIRA. And I'd like to see the puppet deployment changed as a third JIRA/PR.
If you can do that, I can review the first two and get those in. I apologize for the extra work but you'll also get more commits this way. :) RJ > On Oct 5, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Jonathan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah, you guys reminded me that I'd completely forgotten to include in my > Spark 1.5.1 patch the changes I had made to add R to the toolchain, but it > sounds like you don't actually want that added right now anyway? Of course, > Spark won't build without it though (after my patch, that is), unless I > were to make some other changes to the Spark build to make SparkR optional. > Is that something you want me to do, or should I just wait for the work > that Olaf has proposed? > > Thanks, > Jonathan > >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Am 05.10.2015 um 09:12 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:22PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> there are options to have clean room dependency installation for debian >> and >>>> rpm systems: debian's pbuilder and fedora's mock. >>>> >>>> These would make the whole dependency installation by puppet obsolete. >>>> Everything would be installed on demand only and thrown away afterwards. >>>> >>>> If I have enough time I will look into integrating this into our >> toolchain >>>> (at least optionally) >>> >>> That'd be quite cool, thanks! I wonder where it leaves Susa? >>> >>> Cos >> >> ... gooogling ... >> >> opensuse does have a thing called "build", shares the same idea. >> >> Olaf >>
