RJ, Yes, makes sense. And good point about it meaning more commits. :) Hehe.
~ Jonathan On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, RJ Nowling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > I actually want to remove R from the Spark 1.5.1 patch and add Spark R + > the toll chain changes as a second patch / JIRA. And I'd like to see the > puppet deployment changed as a third JIRA/PR. > > If you can do that, I can review the first two and get those in. > > I apologize for the extra work but you'll also get more commits this way. > :) > > RJ > > > On Oct 5, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Jonathan Kelly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Ah, you guys reminded me that I'd completely forgotten to include in my > > Spark 1.5.1 patch the changes I had made to add R to the toolchain, but > it > > sounds like you don't actually want that added right now anyway? Of > course, > > Spark won't build without it though (after my patch, that is), unless I > > were to make some other changes to the Spark build to make SparkR > optional. > > Is that something you want me to do, or should I just wait for the work > > that Olaf has proposed? > > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Am 05.10.2015 um 09:12 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:22PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> there are options to have clean room dependency installation for > debian > >> and > >>>> rpm systems: debian's pbuilder and fedora's mock. > >>>> > >>>> These would make the whole dependency installation by puppet obsolete. > >>>> Everything would be installed on demand only and thrown away > afterwards. > >>>> > >>>> If I have enough time I will look into integrating this into our > >> toolchain > >>>> (at least optionally) > >>> > >>> That'd be quite cool, thanks! I wonder where it leaves Susa? > >>> > >>> Cos > >> > >> ... gooogling ... > >> > >> opensuse does have a thing called "build", shares the same idea. > >> > >> Olaf > >> >
