Hi Cos, Is it correct that we should not put our release artifacts on apache dist, since Apache is about code not binaries?
Can we use something like bintray.org ? Looks like the functionality we need: RPM and DEB repo, and does have an API. Olaf > Am 18.10.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Evans Ye <[email protected]>: > > Guys I've a bad news. > I'm guessing that our official released 1.0 repos on S3 are also tied with > Cloudera's credentials, which is why we no longer have S3 repos available > for users to consume now(I've tried centos6 and debian8). > That's really bad in user experience. :( > Cos, > * Could you please confirm where we put 1.0 repos on? > * If my guess is right, do you still have copies of signed repos at local > for restore? > * I don't have knowledge of how our current S3 resources are being managed. > And we don't have S3 resources available from Tom's team, hence I think we > need to plan for this now. > > Evans
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
