Seemingly we have a consensus here, but this is a policy change, so I will start an official [VOTE] to wrap it up. Thanks!
Cos On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:19PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > Hi, > > Seems I haven't broken too much ;-) +1 from me, too. > > Thanks. > Olaf > > > > Am 17.11.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>: > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> What I find real good about this experiment is that we don't see any abuse > >> of > >> this policy. Committers are actively seeking the feedback if they feel a > >> need > >> to have a discussion about the implementation. Which is one of the most > >> common > >> objections to the model. > > > > +1 to that! > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
