Ofcourse if that doesnt fit we can roll back to RTC :) 2015年9月20日 上午3:20於 "Evans Ye" <[email protected]>寫道：
> This is way better than mine! > With practical use & try we can have concrete idea of how CTR works in our > community. We can develop our policy to handle real world cases instead of > just imaging it. > 2015年9月20日 上午3:11於 "Konstantin Boudnik" <[email protected]>寫道： > >> I'd rather avoid or at least postpone the voting until we have everyone >> being >> comfortable with the proposed changed. I really don't like an idea of >> someone >> being in minority and being forced to play alone. On the other hand, I >> see a >> bunch of situations where CTR would be beneficial e.g BIGTOP-2057. >> >> If as Evans said all questions were answered, let's proceed to voting. If >> not >> - let's give CTR a try for say a couple of months and see how it works for >> everybody. We hardly can do any irreversible harm even if we try - we can >> always revert anything we don't like ;) >> >> Cos >> >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:52AM, Evans Ye wrote: >> > To summarise this discussing thread, I think we have most of our team >> > member supporting CTR model and questions from RTC advocates are >> answered. >> > I propose to start a vote to officially made decision wether or not to >> > switch to CTR. >> > If that passed, we then start drafting our CTR policy through >> discussion. >> > Any other thoughts? >> > >> > 2015-09-18 2:50 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > Can I ask RTC advocate to review a couple of patches to unblock me? >> > > >> > > BIGTOP-2025 >> > > BIGTOP-2051 >> > > >> > > Thank you very much! >> > > Cos >> > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:32AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:35PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: >> > > > > Sorry, I haven't followed the initial discussion since I was not >> > > onboard at that time. >> > > > > >> > > > > From my view bigtop is the fastest moving project, I ever knew. I >> am >> > > active >> > > > > for over 20 years in all kinds of opensource projects, but bigtops >> > > tops them >> > > > > all in speed, second fastest maybe samba and linux kernel at 0.0x >> > > > >> > > > That's so good to hear! Made my day, if not the whole week! Speaks >> tons >> > > about >> > > > the community we have on this project! >> > > > >> > > > > I am strongly oppose [i.e. -1] the CTR style, since I think the >> > > project -- >> > > > > and myself -- take large benefits from discussions about >> implementing >> > > the >> > > > > best solution for the project. >> > > > >> > > > I think CTR doesn't mean that one can not ever ask for a code review >> > > upfront. >> > > > It's all about trusting the developers to do what's the best for the >> > > project >> > > > without hanging out high and dry in some obvious cases. >> > > > >> > > > > Getting a +1 is not only that a patch simply runs, it is about >> code >> > > style, >> > > > > architectural decisions. Even a one-liner patch can break >> designs. >> > > > >> > > > And that again falls back to the point of trusting the judgement of >> your >> > > peers >> > > > to do the "right thing" and come forward with the discussion before >> > > making the >> > > > changes that are questionable or contraversial. And we won't know >> if it >> > > works >> > > > before we try it at least for some time ;) >> > > > >> > > > Cos >> > > > >> > > > > I think a clear review guideline would help bigtop more that a >> commit >> > > > > policy change. >> > > > > >> > > > > Olaf >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
