Soo.... what's the consensus here?

Thanks,
Roman.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Akira Ajisaka
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created a patch for Apache Giraph to compile with Hadoop 2.7.3.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-1110
>
> Is it work for you?
>
> Regards,
> Akira
>
>
> On 2016/11/29 7:38, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I vote for patching Giraph according to GIRAPH-1112, since it will be a
>>> future-proof (i.e. Hadoop-2.8.x) work around. Additionally, the list of
>>> issues resolved by hadoop-2.7.3 is rather long.
>>
>>
>> I'm confused. Since GIRAPH-1112 doesn't have a patch attached to it, I
>> presume you
>> suggest that we patch Hadoop 2.7.3 by the patch provided on HADOOP-13579 ?
>>
>> When it comes to custom patching in Bigtop -- I'm a little bit nervous
>> when we have
>> to do it with Hadoop itself (other components I'm less concerned about).
>>
>> I think 2.7.4 should be out soon enough. I can also check with ODPi
>> members around the
>> migration plans of various vendors. IOW, if it all checks out -- is
>> there any reason not
>> to go with 2.7.4?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> P.S. This all reminds me that we should probably have an experimental
>> branch for Hadoop 3.
>> Now that I'm back from my travels -- this is something I'd be more
>> that willing to look at.
>>
>

Reply via email to