I rather move to Hadoop 2.7.4, if the release day is near. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Soo.... what's the consensus here? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Akira Ajisaka > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've created a patch for Apache Giraph to compile with Hadoop 2.7.3. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-1110 > > > > Is it work for you? > > > > Regards, > > Akira > > > > > > On 2016/11/29 7:38, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I vote for patching Giraph according to GIRAPH-1112, since it will be a > >>> future-proof (i.e. Hadoop-2.8.x) work around. Additionally, the list of > >>> issues resolved by hadoop-2.7.3 is rather long. > >> > >> > >> I'm confused. Since GIRAPH-1112 doesn't have a patch attached to it, I > >> presume you > >> suggest that we patch Hadoop 2.7.3 by the patch provided on > HADOOP-13579 ? > >> > >> When it comes to custom patching in Bigtop -- I'm a little bit nervous > >> when we have > >> to do it with Hadoop itself (other components I'm less concerned about). > >> > >> I think 2.7.4 should be out soon enough. I can also check with ODPi > >> members around the > >> migration plans of various vendors. IOW, if it all checks out -- is > >> there any reason not > >> to go with 2.7.4? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Roman. > >> > >> P.S. This all reminds me that we should probably have an experimental > >> branch for Hadoop 3. > >> Now that I'm back from my travels -- this is something I'd be more > >> that willing to look at. > >> > > >
