According to
% gradlew gpdb-info
Info for package gpdb
Will download from URL:
https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/archive/master.zip
which is exactly the archive of the current master branch.
Cos
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:10PM, MrAsanjar . wrote:
> it seems the gpdb source downloaded for the build is not from github
> master, check the config.guess timestamp msg:
>
> config.guess timestamp = 2011-05-11
>
> uname -m = ppc64le
> uname -r = 4.4.0-34-generic
> uname -s = Linux
> uname -v = #53-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 27 16:04:07 UTC 2016
>
>
> The new config.guess has the timestamp of timestamp='2017-01-01'
> https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/blob/master/config/config.guess
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I see why its failing -- I just thought that's exactly what that patch
> > that went in was supposed to fix.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > On ppc64le it is failing because of this
> > >
> > > UNAME_VERSION = #53-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 27 16:04:07 UTC 2016
> > > configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 02:22PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > hi amir
> > >> >
> > >> > the bigtop.bom for gpdb is plain insane: it fetches git trunk, rather
> > a defined piece of software.
> > >>
> > >> correct. but fwiw: since it does fetch trunk that patch should be in
> > >> there (since it was merged).
> > >>
> > >> this, in turn, makes me wonder why the heck the build is still red.
> > >> any thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> > we should change it to fetch the git merge point of that commit
> > instead or any later commit for now.
> > >> > i am very busy right now, anyone else can pick up that task.
> > >> >
> > >> > roman committed himself to update bigtop.bom when there is a
> > release;-/
> > >>
> > >> still working on this -- but since it may not alight with the bigtop
> > >> release timeline we may
> > >> need to discuss other options (like not releasing it, etc.).
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Roman.
> >