Hi, The Debian-9 is indeed a feature patch, which can be omitted from 1.2.1 .
BIGTOP-2808 is rather risky to include, but is needed to fix a deployment issue. This has to be tested by other devs as well. Olaf > Am 25.06.2017 um 19:54 schrieb Evans Ye <[email protected]>: > > Hi all, > > Olaf asked on slack that how do we do 1.2.1 release when there's no patch > goes in 1.2-branch and most on the patches for 1.2.1 are on master. > > My thinking is directly release 1.2.1 version from master, with following > reasons: > > 1. We did not bump master to 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT > 2. With small number of components upgraded we can say it's a minor version > release for bigtop. We've discussed this to meet the goal of release > earlier, release often. > 3. it seems most of the 1.3 fixed issues[1] can also reside in 1.2.1 except > Debian-9 support, which may or may not be excluded because it's quite > independent. > 4. We don't have too much resource to maintain two release lines. We shall > better keep it simple as long as it's still a reasonable way. > > We're close to the end of June so I'll start to prepare the release. For > those doc related JIRAs, I'll try to get them polished before the release. > Please help me to get the others fixed if you've some free cycles :) > > [1]. https://s.apache.org/byeu > > > > 2017-05-29 21:05 GMT+08:00 Arnaud Launay <[email protected]>: > >> Le Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:24:34AM +0800, Evans Ye a écrit: >>> Surely we can add Solr 6.5.1(BIGTOP-2784) to 1.2.1 release. Do >>> you have time to get it to the finish line recently? >> >> Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge about it to really >> understand what's needed and what's not, the install.sh I have >> edited so far is mostly "err, this file doesn't exist anymore, >> let's comment the line to let the compilation continue". >> >> So I do have a compiling solr 6, but I'm fairly certain the >> generated packages are incomplete :/ >> >> Arnaud. >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
