Hi all, I'm currently hitting a strange problem building 1.2.1 packages. Solr fails to build on centos-6, centos-7, debian-8, and fedora-25[1]. But according to our CI for trunk packages[2], they should be OK except on Fedora. I've tried to use trunk images building Solr manually on centos and debian. It works.
Since branch-1.2 has master merged in, the code should be no difference. Therefore I can only imaging the following two possibilities: 1. Somehow packages on centos and debian changed. If we rebuild bigtop/slaves for trunk, then Solr will fail the same as what we faced building with 1.2.1 images. 2. We've special tweaks for bigtop/slaves trunk images. Any thoughts? Evans [1]. https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-1.2.1/ [2]. https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/Packages/job/Bigtop-trunk-packages/ 2017-07-22 2:37 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > Got it, that makes sense. > I have added this note to > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Bigtop+CI+Setup+Guide > > Thanks, > Cos > -- > With regards, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Evans Ye <[email protected]> wrote: > > urgh... > > This is a bit off document, but good to be brought up. > > The fact is we got 3 * 1T donated storages. Hence 1T for master, and > > another 2 * 1T goes to 06 and 07, respectively. Without storage we only > got > > 40G for each node to operate, which can't fit docker images in at all. > > Therefore only 06 and 07 enabled to build packages. > > > > 02 and 03 are deployed to run non storage sensitive jobs such as > > provisioner. > > > > 2017-07-22 0:18 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > > > >> Only slightly off-topic: I am looking at the CI and see that only > >> slaves 06 and 07 are used for x86 builds. Is there any reason we > >> aren't utilizing 02 and 03? May be I am missing something, but adding > >> those to the queue would cut our build times about 50%, no? > >> -- > >> With regards, > >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Evans Ye <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi Peter, > >> > > >> > What do you mean by: That said, *not* releasing on 42.1 is not an > issue > >> for > >> > me. 42.3 is about > >> > If that's a signal to bump Bigtop supported opensuse to 42.3, then we > can > >> > try. > >> > But one thing we need your help is to get 42.3 official image on the > >> shelf: > >> > https://hub.docker.com/r/library/opensuse/tags/ > >> > > >> > I've dig around for the current 42.1 slave image build and most likely > >> it's > >> > a package conflict issue. > >> > If 42.3 image is not gonna happened soon. How about 42.2? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2017-07-15 5:46 GMT+08:00 Peter Linnell <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> >> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:16:32 -0700 > >> >> Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Shall we bump the Suse version then? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> <snip> > >> >> > >> >> Yes. definitely. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> >> Peter > >> >> > >> >
