AFAIK, the build slave for arm is offline in our CI: docker-slave-arm-1 <https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/computer/docker-slave-arm-1/> (offline)
If you can get it back into business, then there's no reason not to include it as long as it's in good shape. 2017-10-13 3:31 GMT+08:00 Ganesh Raju <[email protected]>: > Evans > > What is needed to reestablish the CI builds for Aarch? We are ready to help > that getting setup as well > We have setup CI builds internally in Linaro which has been working fine. > > Do you need access to the two arm systems for builds? > > > Thanks, > Ganesh > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Evans Ye <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Kevin for doing the investigation. That is addressed in > BIGTOP-2904. > > > > Regarding to 1.2.1 release. I've finally crossed the finish line and have > > put it up for a vote. > > Let me share some of the details here: > > > > * All the signed repos are on repos.bigtop.apache.org, which is backed > by > > our new S3 directory > > * Deployment evaluated by > > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/Provisioner/job/Bigtop-1. > > 2.1-deployments/, > > which installs packages from repos.bigtop.apache.org. Surely we've some > > red > > dots, but those problems are also in 1.2.0 as well. 1.2.1 actually > > improves/fixes things that was broken in 1.2.0. > > * Binary convenient artifacts are not available for PPC64LE, but we can > > still put them up afterwards. > > > > Thanks for everyone who helped making this release happening. > > The release stuffs are in the [VOTE] mailing thread. If you've time. > Please > > give it try and provide your feedback. > > > > > > Evans > > > > > > > > 2017-10-10 2:02 GMT+08:00 Kevin Monroe <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hey Evans, ubuntu 16.04 seems ok from your CI link, but fedora 25 has a > > > problem: > > > > > > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-1.2.1-ppc64le/OS= > > > fedora-25-ppc64le/lastFailedBuild/console > > > > > > I *think* I've tracked this down to the location of protobuf. Note the > > URL > > > for rpm-based ppc64le distros: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bigtop/blob/master/bigtop_ > > > toolchain/manifests/protobuf.pp#L54 > > > > > > Those fedora-22 URLs are no longer valid: > > > > > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/ > > > 22/Everything/ppc64le/ > > > > > > It seems in late September, fedora 22 moved to fedora archives, so I > > think > > > we just need those URLs changed to: > > > > > > http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora- > > > secondary/releases/22/Everything/ppc64le/ > > > > > > I don't have the capacity to test fedora on a ppc64le machine, but it > > seems > > > like simple fix on paper ;) > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Evans Ye <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Okay, heading down the path to 1.2.1 release. > > > > I'm on the journey to prepare the repos on S3... > > > > > > > > PROGRESS > > > > [V] Build 1.2.1 Docker slave images > > > > [V] Build 1.2.1 RPM/DEB packages > > > > [V] Sign packages > > > > [X] Upload artifacts to S3 > > > > [X] Run through deployment test > > > > [X] Vote for RC -> release > > > > > > > > Finally I'm able to produce all x86_64 artifacts: > > > > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-1.2.1 > > > > (Actually I've to keep retrying to get these builds done. Don't know > > why > > > > sometimes entering infinite loop though...) > > > > and their corresponding signed repos for S3 uploading. > > > > > > > > However, I got some problems with PPC64LE. > > > > We can build arch independent artifacts on other machines for sure, > but > > > > hadoop, > > > > qfs, bigtop-jsvc, zookeeper, hue need to be built on PPC machines. > And > > > that > > > > is currently failing on ubuntu 16.04: > > > > https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/Releases/job/Bigtop-1.2.1-ppc64le/ > > > > > > > > At a glance I guess something need to be fixed for PPC docker slaves > > > image. > > > > I can give it a look, but if some one can help it would be > appreciated. > > > > It is indeed tons of work for getting a release out ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-10-03 23:22 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > The failure of gpdb looks like a serious problem to me, see > > BIGTOP-2901 > > > > > I am too for an +1 to disable this for 1.2.1 > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Evans for being still on track to release. > > > > > > > > > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 03.10.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik < > [email protected] > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, if we can't fix it - let's nuke it. +1 > > > > > > -- > > > > > > With regards, > > > > > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > > > > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the > > author, > > > > > > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the > > author > > > > > > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Evans Ye <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Olaf! > > > > > >> I see all the slaves images are now back to normal. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I'll have a national holiday tomorrow and I'd like to spend it > on > > > > Bigtop > > > > > >> 1.2.1 release. > > > > > >> Right now, we're blocked by two issues: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Crunch build failed: https://issues.apache.org/ > > > > jira/browse/BIGTOP-2900 > > > > > >> GPDB build failed: https://issues.apache.org/ > > > jira/browse/BIGTOP-2901 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I've provided a workaround patch in BIGTOP-2900, however I have > > > > > completely > > > > > >> no idea for BIGTOP-2901. > > > > > >> Since I've raised the problem few days ago, if no one has time > to > > > fix > > > > > it, > > > > > >> I'd like to propose to disable GPDB in 1.2.1 release. > > > > > >> That means in 1.2.1 release there is no GPDB binary artifact > > > > available, > > > > > but > > > > > >> we can still refine GPDB's quality in the master branch. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> How do you think? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 2017-09-26 5:16 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Let me take a look today > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Konstantin Boudnik < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> Explicitly adding Rvs in the loop > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > >>>> With regards, > > > > > >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > > >>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the > > > > author, > > > > > >>>> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the > > > author > > > > > >>>> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Evans Ye < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>>> Hi Bigtoper, > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> I'm working on the 1.2.1 release. Hopefully we can get it to > > the > > > > > finish > > > > > >>>>> line by the end on Sept. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Right now we still have a few issues blocking: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> 1. GPDB build failed on OpenSuSE 42.1[1] > > > > > >>>>> 2. Toolchain build failed on PPC64LE platform[2] > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> I'll update more down the path. But right now I'd like to > seek > > > for > > > > > some > > > > > >>>>> helps on GPDB and PPC64LE side ;) > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> [1]. https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/ > view/Releases/job/Bigtop-1.2 > > . > > > 1/ > > > > > >>>>> [2]. https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/view/Docker/job/Docker- > > > > > >>> Toolchain-1.2.1/ > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> 2017-07-26 11:24 GMT+08:00 Evans Ye <[email protected]>: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks, Arnaud > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> [jenkins@ip bigtop-ubuntu-16.04]$ docker run -ti --rm > > > > > >>>>>> bigtop/slaves:1.2.1-$OS bash -l > > > > > >>>>>> root@596ef2c638de:/# java -version > > > > > >>>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0_131" > > > > > >>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build > > 1.8.0_131-8u131-b11-0ubuntu1. > > > > > >>>>>> 16.04.2-b11) > > > > > >>>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.131-b11, mixed mode) > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Looks linked! > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> 2017-07-26 3:02 GMT+08:00 Arnaud Launay <[email protected]>: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Le Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:45:50AM +0800, Evans Ye a écrit: > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1. Somehow packages on centos and debian changed. If we > > > rebuild > > > > > >>>>>>>> bigtop/slaves for trunk, then Solr will fail the same as > > what > > > we > > > > > >>> faced > > > > > >>>>>>>> building with 1.2.1 images. > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2. We've special tweaks for bigtop/slaves trunk images. > > > > > >>>>>>>> Any thoughts? > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Check the java version, somehow the java docs whatever > stuff > > > > > >>>>>>> changed in 8.131, and solr doesn't compile anymore with > java8 > > > > > >=131 . > > > > > >>>>>>> Might be linked. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Arnaud. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > IRC: ganeshraju@#linaro on irc.freenode.ne <http://irc.freenode.net/>t >
