Hi Jun,

Could you share the status of 1.3.0 release. Anything you'd like to call
for help?

Thanks,
Evans

Jun HE <[email protected]> 於 2018年10月10日 週三 下午6:13寫道:

> Hi, folks,
>
> I'm planning to start RC2 preparation on 10-12. Please kindly let me know
> if you:
> * need more time to test
> * found problems in RC1, other than provisioners failure
> (centos-7/debian-9)
> * have anything which should be included in RC2
>
> The plan is to start build on 10-12 20:00, Beijing time if no further
> comments are raised.
>
> Thanks & regards,
>
> Jun
>
> Jun HE <[email protected]> 于2018年10月8日周一 上午8:41写道:
>
> >
> > Sure, I will go to work on RC2.
> >
> > Before doing that, I'd like to know if there are other issues you found
> in
> > branch-1.3? So I can fix them before baking RC2. :)
> >
> > Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> 于2018年10月8日周一 上午2:38写道:
> >
> >> So, looks like the vote needs to be stopped until RC2 is ready, right?
> >> Otherwise, things will become confusing...
> >>
> >> Cos
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 07:07PM, Jun HE wrote:
> >> > I've tested CentOS-7 with 4.12.0 puppetlabs-stdlib, will submit patch
> >> soon.
> >> > For Debian, I'll update the config file as you suggested, and
> >> centos/fedora
> >> > config as well.
> >> > They should be ready in today for review.
> >> >
> >> > Evans Ye <[email protected]> 于2018年10月3日周三 下午1:48写道:
> >> >
> >> > > For provisioner part, I tested CentOS, Ubuntu, and Debian.
> >> > > Currently only Ubuntu works.
> >> > > * CentOS: Need to pin down the puppetlabs-stdlib to 4.12.0 as Jun He
> >> > > suggested
> >> > > * Debian: Just need to update config file from debian 8 to debian 9.
> >> > >
> >> > > Jun are you already working on this or you need my help fixing them?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Jun HE <[email protected]> 於 2018年9月30日 週日 下午2:30寫道:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Olaf,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > For debian provision test, use bigtop/puppet:1.3.0-debian-9 should
> >> work.
> >> > > > As for issue in centos-7, it should be the same of previous
> >> puppet-stdlib
> >> > > > dependency (See:
> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/MODULES-3962
> >> ).
> >> > > Pin
> >> > > > puppet-stdlib to 4.12.0 should fix this problem.
> >> > > > I'll do test and submit fix if local verification is OK.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> 于2018年9月30日周日 上午12:03写道:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I tried the docker provisioner and it failed for debian because
> >> > > > /sbin/init
> >> > > > > not present in bigtop/puppet:trunk-debian-9
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --- config --
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > docker:
> >> > > > >         memory_limit: "4g"
> >> > > > >         image: "bigtop/puppet:trunk-debian-9"
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > repo: "
> >> http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.3.0/debian/9/x86_64";
> >> > > > > distro: debian
> >> > > > > components: [hdfs, yarn, mapreduce]
> >> > > > > enable_local_repo: false
> >> > > > > smoke_test_components: [hdfs, yarn, mapreduce]
> >> > > > > ---------
> >> > > > > I can live with it, since docker provisioner had many issues
> with
> >> > > systemd
> >> > > > > in the past:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > But it failed for centos-7  too.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > + docker exec
> >> > > > > 8d3cf8113318d6b695a85742b985b65d6e146152a7019994dfb8fd8cf0017297
> >> bash
> >> > > -c
> >> > > > > 'puppet apply --parser future
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> --modulepath=/bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules:/etc/puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
> >> > > > > /bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/manifests'
> >> > > > > + future='--parser future'
> >> > > > > + docker exec
> >> > > > > c18b89c4cfd0847d71798b0bf5a86db01c6f3becb42b8ba293343227a71a8717
> >> bash
> >> > > -c
> >> > > > > 'puppet apply --parser future
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> --modulepath=/bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules:/etc/puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
> >> > > > > /bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/manifests'
> >> > > > > + future='--parser future'
> >> > > > > + docker exec
> >> > > > > 79b0a9ce1ae5d25f25cbf35c3e3b8e26131ca556a2b046eca56737020ffbd31e
> >> bash
> >> > > -c
> >> > > > > 'puppet apply --parser future
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> --modulepath=/bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules:/etc/puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
> >> > > > > /bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/manifests'
> >> > > > > Warning: Config file /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml not found, using
> Hiera
> >> > > > defaults
> >> > > > > Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in any
> >> Hiera
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > file and no default supplied on node
> >> 8d3cf8113318.bigtop.apache.org
> >> > > > > Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in any
> >> Hiera
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > file and no default supplied on node
> >> 8d3cf8113318.bigtop.apache.org
> >> > > > > Warning: Config file /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml not found, using
> Hiera
> >> > > > defaults
> >> > > > > Warning: Config file /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml not found, using
> Hiera
> >> > > > defaults
> >> > > > > Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in any
> >> Hiera
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > file and no default supplied on node
> >> c18b89c4cfd0.bigtop.apache.org
> >> > > > > Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in any
> >> Hiera
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > file and no default supplied on node
> >> c18b89c4cfd0.bigtop.apache.org
> >> > > > > Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in any
> >> Hiera
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > file and no default supplied on node
> >> 79b0a9ce1ae5.bigtop.apache.org
> >> > > > > Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in any
> >> Hiera
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > file and no default supplied on node
> >> 79b0a9ce1ae5.bigtop.apache.org
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > ----
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Evans, what do you think: Can you reproduce issues ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Olaf
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Am 29.09.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Jun HE <[email protected]>:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Already updated.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Jun HE <[email protected]> 于2018年9月29日周六 下午3:20写道:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> Sure. Will update them today.
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> Evans Ye <[email protected]> 于2018年9月29日周六 下午2:32写道:
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >>> I need some extra time to perform evaluation and give my +1
> >> out.
> >> > > > > >>> I'll be back to Taiwan tomorrow which I'll have full network
> >> > > > > >>> accessibility.
> >> > > > > >>> However, if you got enough vote for the release, go ahead
> w/o
> >> > > waiting
> >> > > > > me.
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>> BTW, I poked around for the checksum, it seems that our
> >> checksum
> >> > > for
> >> > > > a
> >> > > > > >>> release is gathered from nexus, which is probably generated
> by
> >> > > maven.
> >> > > > > >>> Though there's no SHA256/512 available for download, we can
> >> just
> >> > > > > generate
> >> > > > > >>> one by ourselves and commit it in SVN for releasing
> >> > > > > >>> Seems that Flink is doing in this way:
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/tools/releasing/create_binary_release.sh#L85
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>> Jun, would you please update the checksum for the release?
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>> Best,
> >> > > > > >>> Evans
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>> Evans Ye <[email protected]> 於 2018年9月27日 週四 上午12:47寫道:
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>>> When trying to evaluate the release, I noticed that [1]
> >> requires
> >> > > > > SHA-256
> >> > > > > >>>> or SHA-512 signature.
> >> > > > > >>>> While our release process currently produces SHA1 and MD5.
> >> These 2
> >> > > > > must
> >> > > > > >>>> not be supplied.
> >> > > > > >>>> I didn't dig in to it yet.
> >> > > > > >>>> Roman, Cos would mind to point out where to look for?
> >> > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > >>>> [1]
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
> >> > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > >>>> Naresh Bhat <[email protected]> 於 2018年9月26日 週三
> >> 下午4:51寫道:
> >> > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>> +1
> >> > > > > >>>>> I have compiled v1.3 branch and executing the smoke tests
> on
> >> > > ARM64
> >> > > > > >>>>> machine.
> >> > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 08:44, Jun HE <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> This is the vote for release 1.3.0 of Apache Bigtop.
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> It fixes the following issues:
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12338976&projectId=12311420
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
> >> closed
> >> > > on
> >> > > > > >>>>>> Saturday,
> >> > > > > >>>>>> September 29, 2018 at noon PDT.  Please download, test
> and
> >> vote
> >> > > > with
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC1 as the official 1.3.0 release of
> Apache
> >> > > Bigtop
> >> > > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >> > > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC1 as the official 1.3.0 release
> of
> >> > > Apache
> >> > > > > >>>>> Bigtop,
> >> > > > > >>>>>> because...
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> Source and binary files:
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bigtop/bigtop-1.3.0-RC1/
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> Maven staging repo:
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebigtop-1019
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> The git tag to be voted upon is release-1.3.0
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>> Bigtop's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> >> > > release:
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bigtop/KEYS
> >> > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to