Hi, Olaf,

These downloading failures were observed on other archs as well. Just
randomly happend.
And I saw several times the failure happened in zeppelin's zeppelin-web.

Regards,

Jun

Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> 于2018年10月26日周五 下午12:52写道:

> Hi Jun,
>
> these random artifact failures made me build the nexus artifact cache,
> which I had to disable because it finally tripped over other problems, I
> was aware but didn't show up before. I don't think just enabling it again
> will help. I will work on a new solution. Will create a jira to track the
> efforts.
>
> for the time please do cheat like copying together independent runs, I
> would recommend.
>
> one question: does this random download failures still mostly show on
> amd64 or do you observe it on ppc64le and aarch64 as well?
>
> Olaf
>
> Von meinem iPad gesendet
>
> > Am 26.10.2018 um 03:27 schrieb Jun HE <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Sorry for not updating for a while.
> >
> > Actually I was struggling in building the 1.3 RC2 for last two weeks. I
> > cannot get the Bigtop-1.3.0 job successfully finished in one shot.
> There've
> > always been some random artifacts downloading issue, happened for
> different
> > arch and distros, caused some subjob failed. See fedora-26 and
> > opensuse-42.3 on amd64 (
> https://ci.bigtop.apache.org/job/Bigtop-1.3.0/25/)
> >
> > I tried these two subjob in job-26 and they succeeded. And I'm intended
> to
> > use their outputs (job-25/26) to prepare RC2. Do you see any risk or
> > problem it could be?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > Evans Ye <[email protected]> 于2018年10月26日周五 上午1:21写道:
> >
> >> Hi Jun,
> >>
> >> Could you share the status of 1.3.0 release. Anything you'd like to call
> >> for help?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Evans
> >>
> >> Jun HE <[email protected]> 於 2018年10月10日 週三 下午6:13寫道:
> >>
> >>> Hi, folks,
> >>>
> >>> I'm planning to start RC2 preparation on 10-12. Please kindly let me
> know
> >>> if you:
> >>> * need more time to test
> >>> * found problems in RC1, other than provisioners failure
> >>> (centos-7/debian-9)
> >>> * have anything which should be included in RC2
> >>>
> >>> The plan is to start build on 10-12 20:00, Beijing time if no further
> >>> comments are raised.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks & regards,
> >>>
> >>> Jun
> >>>
> >>> Jun HE <[email protected]> 于2018年10月8日周一 上午8:41写道:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure, I will go to work on RC2.
> >>>>
> >>>> Before doing that, I'd like to know if there are other issues you
> found
> >>> in
> >>>> branch-1.3? So I can fix them before baking RC2. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> 于2018年10月8日周一 上午2:38写道:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So, looks like the vote needs to be stopped until RC2 is ready,
> right?
> >>>>> Otherwise, things will become confusing...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 07:07PM, Jun HE wrote:
> >>>>>> I've tested CentOS-7 with 4.12.0 puppetlabs-stdlib, will submit
> >> patch
> >>>>> soon.
> >>>>>> For Debian, I'll update the config file as you suggested, and
> >>>>> centos/fedora
> >>>>>> config as well.
> >>>>>> They should be ready in today for review.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Evans Ye <[email protected]> 于2018年10月3日周三 下午1:48写道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For provisioner part, I tested CentOS, Ubuntu, and Debian.
> >>>>>>> Currently only Ubuntu works.
> >>>>>>> * CentOS: Need to pin down the puppetlabs-stdlib to 4.12.0 as Jun
> >> He
> >>>>>>> suggested
> >>>>>>> * Debian: Just need to update config file from debian 8 to debian
> >> 9.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jun are you already working on this or you need my help fixing
> >> them?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jun HE <[email protected]> 於 2018年9月30日 週日 下午2:30寫道:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Olaf,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For debian provision test, use bigtop/puppet:1.3.0-debian-9
> >> should
> >>>>> work.
> >>>>>>>> As for issue in centos-7, it should be the same of previous
> >>>>> puppet-stdlib
> >>>>>>>> dependency (See:
> >>> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/MODULES-3962
> >>>>> ).
> >>>>>>> Pin
> >>>>>>>> puppet-stdlib to 4.12.0 should fix this problem.
> >>>>>>>> I'll do test and submit fix if local verification is OK.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> 于2018年9月30日周日 上午12:03写道:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I tried the docker provisioner and it failed for debian
> >> because
> >>>>>>>> /sbin/init
> >>>>>>>>> not present in bigtop/puppet:trunk-debian-9
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --- config --
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> docker:
> >>>>>>>>>        memory_limit: "4g"
> >>>>>>>>>        image: "bigtop/puppet:trunk-debian-9"
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> repo: "
> >>>>> http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.3.0/debian/9/x86_64";
> >>>>>>>>> distro: debian
> >>>>>>>>> components: [hdfs, yarn, mapreduce]
> >>>>>>>>> enable_local_repo: false
> >>>>>>>>> smoke_test_components: [hdfs, yarn, mapreduce]
> >>>>>>>>> ---------
> >>>>>>>>> I can live with it, since docker provisioner had many issues
> >>> with
> >>>>>>> systemd
> >>>>>>>>> in the past:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But it failed for centos-7  too.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> + docker exec
> >>>>>>>>>
> >> 8d3cf8113318d6b695a85742b985b65d6e146152a7019994dfb8fd8cf0017297
> >>>>> bash
> >>>>>>> -c
> >>>>>>>>> 'puppet apply --parser future
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> --modulepath=/bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules:/etc/puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
> >>>>>>>>> /bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/manifests'
> >>>>>>>>> + future='--parser future'
> >>>>>>>>> + docker exec
> >>>>>>>>>
> >> c18b89c4cfd0847d71798b0bf5a86db01c6f3becb42b8ba293343227a71a8717
> >>>>> bash
> >>>>>>> -c
> >>>>>>>>> 'puppet apply --parser future
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> --modulepath=/bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules:/etc/puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
> >>>>>>>>> /bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/manifests'
> >>>>>>>>> + future='--parser future'
> >>>>>>>>> + docker exec
> >>>>>>>>>
> >> 79b0a9ce1ae5d25f25cbf35c3e3b8e26131ca556a2b046eca56737020ffbd31e
> >>>>> bash
> >>>>>>> -c
> >>>>>>>>> 'puppet apply --parser future
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> --modulepath=/bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules:/etc/puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
> >>>>>>>>> /bigtop-home/bigtop-deploy/puppet/manifests'
> >>>>>>>>> Warning: Config file /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml not found, using
> >>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> defaults
> >>>>>>>>> Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in
> >> any
> >>>>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>> file and no default supplied on node
> >>>>> 8d3cf8113318.bigtop.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in
> >> any
> >>>>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>> file and no default supplied on node
> >>>>> 8d3cf8113318.bigtop.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> Warning: Config file /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml not found, using
> >>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> defaults
> >>>>>>>>> Warning: Config file /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml not found, using
> >>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> defaults
> >>>>>>>>> Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in
> >> any
> >>>>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>> file and no default supplied on node
> >>>>> c18b89c4cfd0.bigtop.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in
> >> any
> >>>>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>> file and no default supplied on node
> >>>>> c18b89c4cfd0.bigtop.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in
> >> any
> >>>>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>> file and no default supplied on node
> >>>>> 79b0a9ce1ae5.bigtop.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> Error: Could not find data item bigtop::hadoop_head_node in
> >> any
> >>>>> Hiera
> >>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>> file and no default supplied on node
> >>>>> 79b0a9ce1ae5.bigtop.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Evans, what do you think: Can you reproduce issues ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Olaf
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am 29.09.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Jun HE <[email protected]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Already updated.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Jun HE <[email protected]> 于2018年9月29日周六 下午3:20写道:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sure. Will update them today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Evans Ye <[email protected]> 于2018年9月29日周六 下午2:32写道:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I need some extra time to perform evaluation and give my
> >> +1
> >>>>> out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll be back to Taiwan tomorrow which I'll have full
> >> network
> >>>>>>>>>>>> accessibility.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> However, if you got enough vote for the release, go ahead
> >>> w/o
> >>>>>>> waiting
> >>>>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, I poked around for the checksum, it seems that our
> >>>>> checksum
> >>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release is gathered from nexus, which is probably
> >> generated
> >>> by
> >>>>>>> maven.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Though there's no SHA256/512 available for download, we
> >> can
> >>>>> just
> >>>>>>>>> generate
> >>>>>>>>>>>> one by ourselves and commit it in SVN for releasing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Seems that Flink is doing in this way:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/tools/releasing/create_binary_release.sh#L85
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jun, would you please update the checksum for the release?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Evans
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Evans Ye <[email protected]> 於 2018年9月27日 週四 上午12:47寫道:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> When trying to evaluate the release, I noticed that [1]
> >>>>> requires
> >>>>>>>>> SHA-256
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or SHA-512 signature.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> While our release process currently produces SHA1 and
> >> MD5.
> >>>>> These 2
> >>>>>>>>> must
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not be supplied.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't dig in to it yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, Cos would mind to point out where to look for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Naresh Bhat <[email protected]> 於 2018年9月26日 週三
> >>>>> 下午4:51寫道:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have compiled v1.3 branch and executing the smoke
> >> tests
> >>> on
> >>>>>>> ARM64
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 08:44, Jun HE <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the vote for release 1.3.0 of Apache Bigtop.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes the following issues:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12338976&projectId=12311420
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will
> >> be
> >>>>> closed
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saturday,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> September 29, 2018 at noon PDT.  Please download, test
> >>> and
> >>>>> vote
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC1 as the official 1.3.0 release of
> >>> Apache
> >>>>>>> Bigtop
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC1 as the official 1.3.0 release
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bigtop,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary files:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bigtop/bigtop-1.3.0-RC1/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven staging repo:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebigtop-1019
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The git tag to be voted upon is release-1.3.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bigtop's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign
> >> the
> >>>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bigtop/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to