Thanks everyone, here's my vote: +1 (binding): Checked release tarball contents, signature and checksums. Also deployed some core components and ran their smoke tests on a few distros.
With three binding +1s, three non-binding +1s, and no -1 or 0 votes, the vote for 1.5.0 release PASSED. Binding +1s: Evans Ye Jun He Kengo Seki Non-binding +1s: Yuqi Gu Luca Toscano Masatake Iwasaki Thank you all for voting, testing, and giving feedback to make this release happen! I'll start to prepare the formal release and roll it out shortly. Kengo Seki <[email protected]> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:43 AM Jun HE <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh, sorry I made a mistake here. Thanks for pointing that out, Evans. :) > > Correction for my vote: > I'm +1(binding) to accept RC0 as 1.5.0 release. > > Evans Ye <[email protected]> 于2020年12月15日周二 上午1:33写道： > > > Jun He your vote should be a binding one. > > See http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > > > > Luca Toscano <[email protected]> 於 2020年12月14日 週一 下午11:36寫道： > > > > > Correction sorry - the oozie packages are ok, a downgrade was raised > > > when installing the bigtop 1.5 packages since on bigtop 1.4 I have a > > > version of oozie (4.3.0-3) with some extra patches in it (IIRC due to > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-3330). > > > > > > Luca > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:28 AM Kengo Seki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Luca, > > > > > > > > Thank you for the detailed checks! > > > > That's really helpful and informative, so I added some of your > > > > findings to the cwiki. > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.5.0+Support+Matrix > > > > > > > > Kengo Seki <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 5:40 PM Luca Toscano <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:47 AM Kengo Seki <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the vote for release 1.5.0 of Apache Bigtop. > > > > > > > > > > > > [x] +1, accept RC0 as the official 1.5.0 release of Apache Bigtop > > > > > > > > > > (Community vote) > > > > > > > > > > I completed my tests, the new release didn't raise any blocking > > issue. > > > > > My tests were for this use case: > > > > > - Hadoop test cluster with Hive/Oozie/Spark/Jupyter/Hue on bare metal > > > hosts. > > > > > - HDFS and Yarn HA setup (including journal nodes). > > > > > - Bigtop 1.4 for Debian 9 for the majority of the nodes, and a client > > > > > node on Debian 10. > > > > > - In place upgrade from Bigtop 1.4 to 1.5 (upgrading the packages > > > > > without removing the old ones first). > > > > > > > > > > I have tested an in place upgrade, trying to rollback/re-deploy > > before > > > > > the HDFS finalize step, all good. Some interesting things that I > > > > > noticed or had to fix in my config after the upgrade: > > > > > - the HDFS Namenodes seem to be smarter when dealing with a rollback. > > > > > While testing CDH -> Bigtop 1.4 (hdfs 2.6.0 -> 2.8.5) I had to follow > > > > > the upstream guidelines and explicitly issue commands to rollback the > > > > > hdfs state, but when testing this release it was not needed anymore. > > > > > I'll dig a big more into this, but overall the upgrade/rollback > > > > > procedure seemed smoother. > > > > > - our Hadoop clusters never used the > > > > > "yarn.resourcemanager.webapp.address.$rm-id" settings in > > yarn-site.xml > > > > > (that seem to have a good default), but on Bigtop 1.5 it lead to NPE > > > > > while running map-reduce jobs, like described in > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8056. Once I set the > > value, > > > > > everything worked as expected. > > > > > - while upgrading the packages, I had a little hiccup with oozie > > since > > > > > the version on Bigtop 1.4 is higher than 1.5 (4.3.0-3 vs 4.3.0-1), so > > > > > it needed a downgrade. Nothing really major, just mentioning it. > > > > > > > > > > About https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bigtop/bigtop-1.5.0-RC0 > > : > > > > > - verified .asc/.shaXXX, all good. > > > > > - all debian packages (9 and 10 versions) worked fine, and Kengo > > > > > Seki's gpg signature was ok as well. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for this release! > > > > > > > > > > Luca > > > > >
