+1, I think remove elk so we could focus on Hadoop related components. Elk also have theirselve's rpm/deb packages. So, I support the division.
<[email protected]> 于 2022年7月22日周五 17:21写道： > I also +1 to drop those components, including ES and Kibana. > A few month ago I added the patches for log4j to them, it was a little bit > difficult to patch because those products in Bigtop were far from the > latest versions. And as Masatake mentions currently ELK are not Apache 2 > license. > I think it is preferable to drop them, or to replace them to OpenSearch or > another projects which are maintained in Apache 2 license. > > Regards, > Leona Yoda > > From: Masatake Iwasaki <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, July 22, 2022 17:50 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Remove Logstash from Bigtop stack > I'm +1 to drop Logstash (and Elasticsearch and Kibana as well). > We can not upgrade them to upstream version due to incompatible license. > rpm/deb packages are officially provided on their own. > > Thanks, > Masatke Iwasaki > > On 2022/07/22 16:26, 吴治国 wrote: > > Hi community, > > > > as the ELK version in Bigtop is too old, and Logstash is rarely used in > bigdata related projects, I'd like to propose we remove Logstash from > Bigtop stack. > > > > Since Elasticsearch still has lots of users, I recommend we can upgrade > it to 6.1.4 which is the latest version support JDK8 compilation, once we > are supporting JDK9 compilation, we can upgrade it to 6.2.4 as our final > supported version, if the compilation is conflicted with other components > in the future, we can remove Elasticsearch too. > > > > Regarding the Kibana, I'll try to upgrade it too, but I'm not sure if I > can fix the compilation errors since it's a NodeJS project and I'm not very > familiar with it, if I cannot fix it, and no one can help, I'd like to > remove it too. > > > > Can you please tell me your opinion? Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Zhiguo Wu >
