On 8/28/16, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, >
Hello Gary ! > For quite a while now it has been clear that development activity on the > Apache Bloodhound project has stalled, and the current Bloodhound > Project Management Committee has determined that there are not enough > members with the time to dedicate to the project. This is putting the > project on the path to a move to the Apache Attic. > In my opinion, based on the previous experience we had building the MP architecture, the first thing the project needs to move forward is to determine new goals (yes, Trac has changed in the mean time) and redefine the roadmap . I am keen to start doing so from 2017 . BTW , I am thinking of a few approaches to attract new contributors but I'm not sure of how they could work at present with the ASF ... I'll have to make some research on my own . Another thing I wanted to know . If the project moves to the Attic in the end , is there a well established procedure to fork the project ? Any documentation about trademark policies for projects in this state ? -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Brython committer http://brython.info http://github.com/brython-dev/brython SciPy Latin America - Cuban Ambassador Chairman of SciPy LA 2017 - http://scipyla.org/conf/2017 Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
