Hello John On 11/6/17, John Chambers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Olemis, > > The plan that has been discussed before was to migrate to an 0.8 instance. > So we can make use of full multi-product support. I still think this is > possible. > Having multiple instances could cause some confusion in my opinion so I > would look to avoid that if possible. > [...]
There is a reason why b.a.o was not upgraded to 0.8 before . That's why I suggested keeping both VMs during the time 0.8 evolves to become stable (which I think should be the next step, cmiiw). IMHO having a stable multi-product version should be a precondition to shut down 0.4 instance and release a new version (be it 0.8.x , 0.9 or ...). I'll also plan for bringing back to life blood-hound.net multi-product instance. In the process I might get some inspiration to write a Docker file . These days I only tend to deploy services in containers. Nonetheless , like I just said , looking forward I'd recommend doing a (major?) architectural upgrade in BH code base. -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Brython committer http://brython.info http://github.com/brython-dev/brython SciPy Latin America - Cuban Ambassador Chairman of SciPy LA 2017 - http://scipyla.org/conf/2017 Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
