+1 for deploying 0.8 release which is the latest. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM Gary <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, at 03:11 PM, Olemis Lang wrote: > > Hello John > > > > On 11/6/17, John Chambers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Olemis, > > > > > > The plan that has been discussed before was to migrate to an 0.8 > instance. > > > So we can make use of full multi-product support. I still think this is > > > possible. > > > Having multiple instances could cause some confusion in my opinion so I > > > would look to avoid that if possible. > > > > > [...] > > > > There is a reason why b.a.o was not upgraded to 0.8 before . That's > > why I suggested keeping both VMs during the time 0.8 evolves to become > > stable (which I think should be the next step, cmiiw). IMHO having a > > stable multi-product version should be a precondition to shut down 0.4 > > instance and release a new version (be it 0.8.x , 0.9 or ...). > > > > I'll also plan for bringing back to life blood-hound.net multi-product > > instance. In the process I might get some inspiration to write a > > Docker file . These days I only tend to deploy services in containers. > > Nonetheless , like I just said , looking forward I'd recommend doing a > > (major?) architectural upgrade in BH code base. > > > > If we can prove that the 0.8 will work well enough, let's just use that. > I don't think an intermediate situation where we are running two or more > is feasible. We should be using the latest version we can and preferably > the latest release. > > Cheers, > Gary > -- Dammina Sahabandu Associate Tech Lead, AdroitLogic Committer, Apache Software Foundation AMIE (SL) Bsc Eng Hons (Moratuwa) +94716422775
