It's a +1 for git from me. Cheers
John. On 19 March 2018 at 15:10, Dammina Sahabandu <dmsahaba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All/Gary, > > Git overweighs svn in many ways. So +1 for Git. > > Also, apologies about the less involvement in the other thread. I still > couldn't catch a free moment to go through it. But its great to see ideas > being shared. Lets keep it up. > > Thanks, > Dammina > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Daniel Brownridge < > daniel.brownri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [image: I like git!] >> >> On 19/03/18 14:55, Gary Martin wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> As pointed out in another thread, I have not looked for any consensus on use >> of git for issue tracking for work on a trac-less bloodhound. Part of the >> reason would be my imperfect memory of discussions around making more use of >> git and similar. >> >> There are a number of options for how to continue. It could be argued that >> there is no strict need to move away from subversion as we have git >> mirroring already. Indeed, this discussion around git does not impact on the >> ability to experiment with new directions in the short term. >> >> What I feel we definitely need is to start ensuring that we support git as >> part of our development workflow. I expect that to be achievable regardless. >> >> I hope none of the above reveals any bias towards one side or another as I >> do not wish to prejudice this discussion. >> >> Please let us know your thoughts. >> >> Cheers, >> Gary >> >> >> > > > -- > Dammina Sahabandu > PMC & Committer, Apache Software Foundation > AMIE (SL) > Bsc Eng Hons (Moratuwa) > +65 881 129 81 >
