Another +1 for git On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, 18:33 John Chambers, <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's a +1 for git from me. > > Cheers > > John. > > On 19 March 2018 at 15:10, Dammina Sahabandu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi All/Gary, > > > > Git overweighs svn in many ways. So +1 for Git. > > > > Also, apologies about the less involvement in the other thread. I still > > couldn't catch a free moment to go through it. But its great to see ideas > > being shared. Lets keep it up. > > > > Thanks, > > Dammina > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Daniel Brownridge < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> [image: I like git!] > >> > >> On 19/03/18 14:55, Gary Martin wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> As pointed out in another thread, I have not looked for any consensus > on use of git for issue tracking for work on a trac-less bloodhound. Part > of the reason would be my imperfect memory of discussions around making > more use of git and similar. > >> > >> There are a number of options for how to continue. It could be argued > that there is no strict need to move away from subversion as we have git > mirroring already. Indeed, this discussion around git does not impact on > the ability to experiment with new directions in the short term. > >> > >> What I feel we definitely need is to start ensuring that we support git > as part of our development workflow. I expect that to be achievable > regardless. > >> > >> I hope none of the above reveals any bias towards one side or another > as I do not wish to prejudice this discussion. > >> > >> Please let us know your thoughts. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Gary > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Dammina Sahabandu > > PMC & Committer, Apache Software Foundation > > AMIE (SL) > > Bsc Eng Hons (Moratuwa) > > +65 881 129 81 > > >
