Hi everyone, I am also still committed to supporting this project going
forward.
I will do my best to take part in any discussions about its future
development.

Cheers

John.

On Sun, 13 Sep 2020, 14:23 Gary, <alleg...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi everyone and thanks to Shane for bringing this up.
>
> For my part I still have an interest in continuing and I really want to
> get things organised again.
>
> However, this discussion certainly needs to happen. Is there really enough
> interest amongst us to keep this going and can we translate the interest
> into actual action?
>
> Coincidentally, I was planning to take a week off work from the 21st
> September which I was hoping to be able to use to help make some progress
> on Bloodhound. Life being what it is, I am not going to be sure how much of
> that time I will be able dedicate to Bloodhound but I have nothing else
> organised for that time (apart from the Sunday before that). Obviously I
> can't expect others to just drop everything and join me in taking a week
> off on this basis, so I am more hoping that there would be interest from
> people in setting some time aside to chat with me and hopefully others on
> #bloodhound in the-asf Slack and see what progress we can make.
>
> Cheers,
>     Gary
>
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, at 3:45 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> > While we very much appreciate Gary's repeated efforts to bring back new
> > life to Apache Bloodhound, reviewing the past year of dev/user/private
> > traffic and #bloodhound on the-asf's Slack, I don't see other energy.
> >
> > The board meeting is this coming Wednesday, and we'd really like to hear
> > some feedback from the community one way or the other, since there
> > hasn't been a board report since May.
> >
> > - If Gary and anyone who's been involved recently know it's time for the
> > Attic, please let us know - we could post and pass the resolution at
> > either this month's Board meeting or next month's.
> >
> > - If you do feel like you have more energy to drive Apache Bloodhound,
> > then we need the PMC to perform a roll call, to show that at least three
> > people are still active and able to oversee the project:
> >
> >   https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call
> >
> > Reminder: moving to the Apache Attic isn't a bad thing - it's just a
> > recognition that there's no longer an *active* PMC able to manage the
> > project here at the ASF.  All project code, website, mailing lists would
> > get turned read-only, but will *still be available* at the same URLs.
> >
> > Thanks for all the work in the past, and the cute logo!
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Shane
> >   Director & Member
> >   The Apache Software Foundation
> >
>

Reply via email to