I don't have any coding time, but I do have review/oversight time. That makes (4) for oversight.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:54 AM John Chambers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, I am also still committed to supporting this project going > forward. > I will do my best to take part in any discussions about its future > development. > > Cheers > > John. > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2020, 14:23 Gary, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone and thanks to Shane for bringing this up. > > > > For my part I still have an interest in continuing and I really want to > > get things organised again. > > > > However, this discussion certainly needs to happen. Is there really > enough > > interest amongst us to keep this going and can we translate the interest > > into actual action? > > > > Coincidentally, I was planning to take a week off work from the 21st > > September which I was hoping to be able to use to help make some progress > > on Bloodhound. Life being what it is, I am not going to be sure how much > of > > that time I will be able dedicate to Bloodhound but I have nothing else > > organised for that time (apart from the Sunday before that). Obviously I > > can't expect others to just drop everything and join me in taking a week > > off on this basis, so I am more hoping that there would be interest from > > people in setting some time aside to chat with me and hopefully others on > > #bloodhound in the-asf Slack and see what progress we can make. > > > > Cheers, > > Gary > > > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, at 3:45 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > > While we very much appreciate Gary's repeated efforts to bring back new > > > life to Apache Bloodhound, reviewing the past year of dev/user/private > > > traffic and #bloodhound on the-asf's Slack, I don't see other energy. > > > > > > The board meeting is this coming Wednesday, and we'd really like to > hear > > > some feedback from the community one way or the other, since there > > > hasn't been a board report since May. > > > > > > - If Gary and anyone who's been involved recently know it's time for > the > > > Attic, please let us know - we could post and pass the resolution at > > > either this month's Board meeting or next month's. > > > > > > - If you do feel like you have more energy to drive Apache Bloodhound, > > > then we need the PMC to perform a roll call, to show that at least > three > > > people are still active and able to oversee the project: > > > > > > https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call > > > > > > Reminder: moving to the Apache Attic isn't a bad thing - it's just a > > > recognition that there's no longer an *active* PMC able to manage the > > > project here at the ASF. All project code, website, mailing lists > would > > > get turned read-only, but will *still be available* at the same URLs. > > > > > > Thanks for all the work in the past, and the cute logo! > > > > > > -- > > > > > > - Shane > > > Director & Member > > > The Apache Software Foundation > > > > > >
